Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 02 December 2020 |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] FCA 1728 |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Date | 02 December 2020 |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728
File number(s): | WAD 537 of 2018WAD 538 of 2018 WAD 490 of 2016 |
Judgment of: | MORTIMER J |
Date of judgment: | 2 December 2020 |
Catchwords: | NATIVE TITLE – separate questions – overlapping claims – whether a language group holds native title through succession where no identifiable apical ancestor with rights and interests at sovereignty in the whole of the overlap area – whether certain apical ancestors from a different language group had native title rights and interests in overlap area at sovereignty – whether continuing connection – whether a sub-group of an existing native title holding group has separate native title in the overlap area – competing native title applications each upheld in part – Court not currently in a position to make findings as to boundary between the two native title areas |
Legislation: | Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) |
Cases cited: | AB on behalf of the Ngarla People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268; 300 ALR 193 Adnyamathanha No 1 Native Title Claim Group v South Australia (No 2)[2009] FCA 359 Banjima People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 868; 305 ALR 1 Bodney v Bennell[2008] FCAFC 63; 167 FCR 84 Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2015] FCA 9; 325 ALR 213 Dale v Moses[2007] FCAFC 82 Daniel v State of Western Australia[2003] FCA 666 De Rose v South Australia (No 2)[2005] FCAFC 110; 145 FCR 290 De Rose v State of South Australia [2002] FCA 1342 De Rose v State of South Australia[2003] FCAFC 286; 133 FCR 325 Dodd v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 519 Drill on behalf of the Purnululu Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 1510 Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCAFC 69 Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People [2019] FCAFC 177; 273 FCR 350 Gomeroi People v Attorney General of New South Wales [2017] FCA 1464 Jones on behalf of the Yinhawangka People v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 801 Lake Torrens Overlap Proceedings (No 3) [2016] FCA 899 Lardil, Kaiadilt, Yangkaal and Gangalidda Peoples v State of Queensland[2004] FCA 298 Mabo v State of Queensland (No 2)[1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58; 214 CLR 422 Moses v State of Western Australia[2007] FCAFC 78; 160 FCR 148 Narrier v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 1519 Neowarra v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 1402 Northern Territory of Australia v Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakaya Native Title Claim Group [2005] FCAFC 135; 145 FCR 442 Sampi on behalf of the Bardi and Jawi People v State of Western Australia[2010] FCAFC 26; 266 ALR 537 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 939 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 1410 Smith on behalf of the Nharnuwangga, Wajarri and Ngarla People v State of Western Australia[2000] FCA 1249; 104 FCR 494 Starkey v State of South Australia [2014] FCA 924; 319 ALR 231 Starkey on behalf of the Kokatha People v State of South Australia [2018] FCAFC 36; 261 FCR 183 Tommy on behalf of the Yinhawangka Gobawarrah v State of Western Australia (No 2)[2019] FCA 1551 Ward on behalf of the Miriuwung and Gajerrony People v State of Western Australia [1998] FCA 1478; 159 ALR 483 Warrie (formerly TJ) (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 1299 State of Western Australia v Ward [2000] FCAFC 191; 99 FCR 316 Western Australia v Ward[2002] HCA 28; 213 CLR 1 Wyman on behalf of the Bidjara People v State of Queensland [2015] FCAFC 108; 235 FCR 464 Yarmirr v Northern Territory[1998] FCA 771; 82 FCR 533 Murray on behalf of the Yilka Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia (No 5) [2016] FCA 752 |
Division: | General Division |
Registry: | Western Australia |
National Practice Area: | Native Title |
Number of paragraphs: | 1317 |
Date of last submission/s: | 5 May 2020 |
Date of hearing: | 9-12, 15-17 July 2019 5-6 December 2019 25-26 February 2020 |
Counsel for the applicants in WAD537/2018 and WAD538/2018: | Stephen Wright SC |
Solicitor for the applicants in WAD537/2018 and WAD538/2018: | Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation |
Counsel for the applicant in WAD490/2016: | Tina Jowett |
Solicitor for the applicant in WAD490/2016: | Cross Country Native Title Services |
Counsel for the State of Western Australia: | Griff Ranson |
Table of Corrections | |
12 January 2021 | In paragraph 153, the name “Windiwarri” has been changed to with the name “Jarndunha”. |
12 January 2021 | In paragraph 934, the word “decent” has been replaced by “descent”. |
12 January 2021 | In paragraph 1013, the word “Rover” has been replaced by “River”. |
12 January 2021 | In paragraph 1275, the word “not” has been replaced by “no”. |
ORDERS
WAD 537 of 2018 | ||
BETWEEN: | IVAN SMIRKE, ALEC ALEXANDER, KELLMAN LIMERICK Applicant | |
AND: | STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS Respondents | |
WAD 538 of 2018 | ||
BETWEEN: | IVAN SMIRKE, ALEC ALEXANDER, KELLMAN LIMERICK Applicant | |
AND: | STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS Respondents | |
WAD 490 of 2016 | ||
BETWEEN: | ROY TOMMY, NANCY TOMMY, E.G., MARY MILLS Applicant | |
AND: | STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS Respondents | |
order made by: | MORTIMER J |
DATE OF ORDER: | 2 december 2020 |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The questions reserved for consideration be answered as follows:
But for any question of extinguishment of native title, are native title rights and interests (as defined in s 223 of the Native Title Act) held...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Malone v State of Queensland (The Clermont-Belyando Area Native Title Claim) (No 5)
...FCAFC 26 Sampi v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 777 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Starkey v South Australia (2018) 261 FCR 183; [2018] FCAFC 36 State of Queensland v Congoo (2015) 256 CLR 239; [2015] HCA 17 State of Western......
-
Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3)
...Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 939 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Starkey on behalf of the Kokatha People v State of South Australia [2018] FCAFC 36; 261 FCR 183 Strickland v Western Australia [2013] FCA 677......
-
Blucher on behalf of the Gaangalu Nation People v State of Queensland (No 3)
...State of Queensland (No 2) (2015) 325 ALR 583; [2015] FCA 15 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Starkey on behalf of the Kokatha People v State of South Australia (2018) 261 FCR 183; [2018] FCAFC 36 State of Western Australia v Willis ......
-
Gardiner v Taungurung Land and Waters Council
...v State of Western Australia [2010] FCAFC 26; 266 ALR 537 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCA 1726; 57 FCR 451 TTY167 v Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 61; 362 ALR 246 Widjabul Wia-Bal v Attorney-General of NSW......