Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date02 December 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 1728
CourtFederal Court
Date02 December 2020


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728

File number(s):


WAD 537 of 2018WAD 538 of 2018

WAD 490 of 2016



Judgment of:

MORTIMER J



Date of judgment:

2 December 2020



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – separate questions – overlapping claims – whether a language group holds native title through succession where no identifiable apical ancestor with rights and interests at sovereignty in the whole of the overlap area – whether certain apical ancestors from a different language group had native title rights and interests in overlap area at sovereignty – whether continuing connection – whether a sub-group of an existing native title holding group has separate native title in the overlap area – competing native title applications each upheld in part – Court not currently in a position to make findings as to boundary between the two native title areas



Legislation:

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)



Cases cited:

AB on behalf of the Ngarla People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268; 300 ALR 193

Adnyamathanha No 1 Native Title Claim Group v South Australia (No 2)[2009] FCA 359

Banjima People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 868; 305 ALR 1

Bodney v Bennell[2008] FCAFC 63; 167 FCR 84

Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2015] FCA 9; 325 ALR 213

Dale v Moses[2007] FCAFC 82

Daniel v State of Western Australia[2003] FCA 666

De Rose v South Australia (No 2)[2005] FCAFC 110; 145 FCR 290

De Rose v State of South Australia [2002] FCA 1342

De Rose v State of South Australia[2003] FCAFC 286; 133 FCR 325

Dodd v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 519

Drill on behalf of the Purnululu Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 1510

Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCAFC 69

Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People [2019] FCAFC 177; 273 FCR 350

Gomeroi People v Attorney General of New South Wales [2017] FCA 1464

Jones on behalf of the Yinhawangka People v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 801

Lake Torrens Overlap Proceedings (No 3) [2016] FCA 899

Lardil, Kaiadilt, Yangkaal and Gangalidda Peoples v State of Queensland[2004] FCA 298

Mabo v State of Queensland (No 2)[1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1

Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58; 214 CLR 422

Moses v State of Western Australia[2007] FCAFC 78; 160 FCR 148

Narrier v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 1519

Neowarra v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 1402

Northern Territory of Australia v Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakaya Native Title Claim Group [2005] FCAFC 135; 145 FCR 442

Sampi on behalf of the Bardi and Jawi People v State of Western Australia[2010] FCAFC 26; 266 ALR 537

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 939

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 1410

Smith on behalf of the Nharnuwangga, Wajarri and Ngarla People v State of Western Australia[2000] FCA 1249; 104 FCR 494

Starkey v State of South Australia [2014] FCA 924; 319 ALR 231

Starkey on behalf of the Kokatha People v State of South Australia [2018] FCAFC 36; 261 FCR 183

Tommy on behalf of the Yinhawangka Gobawarrah v State of Western Australia (No 2)[2019] FCA 1551

Ward on behalf of the Miriuwung and Gajerrony People v State of Western Australia [1998] FCA 1478; 159 ALR 483

Warrie (formerly TJ) (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 1299

State of Western Australia v Ward [2000] FCAFC 191; 99 FCR 316

Western Australia v Ward[2002] HCA 28; 213 CLR 1

Wyman on behalf of the Bidjara People v State of Queensland [2015] FCAFC 108; 235 FCR 464

Yarmirr v Northern Territory[1998] FCA 771; 82 FCR 533

Murray on behalf of the Yilka Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia (No 5) [2016] FCA 752



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Western Australia



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Number of paragraphs:

1317



Date of last submission/s:

5 May 2020



Date of hearing:

9-12, 15-17 July 2019

5-6 December 2019

25-26 February 2020



Counsel for the applicants in WAD537/2018 and WAD538/2018:

Stephen Wright SC



Solicitor for the applicants in WAD537/2018 and WAD538/2018:

Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation



Counsel for the applicant in WAD490/2016:

Tina Jowett



Solicitor for the applicant in WAD490/2016:

Cross Country Native Title Services



Counsel for the State of Western Australia:

Griff Ranson


Table of Corrections


12 January 2021

In paragraph 153, the name “Windiwarri” has been changed to with the name “Jarndunha”.

12 January 2021

In paragraph 934, the word “decent” has been replaced by “descent”.

12 January 2021

In paragraph 1013, the word “Rover” has been replaced by “River”.

12 January 2021

In paragraph 1275, the word “not” has been replaced by “no”.

ORDERS


WAD 537 of 2018

BETWEEN:

IVAN SMIRKE, ALEC ALEXANDER, KELLMAN LIMERICK

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondents




WAD 538 of 2018

BETWEEN:

IVAN SMIRKE, ALEC ALEXANDER, KELLMAN LIMERICK

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondents




WAD 490 of 2016

BETWEEN:

ROY TOMMY, NANCY TOMMY, E.G., MARY MILLS

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondents



order made by:

MORTIMER J

DATE OF ORDER:

2 december 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. The questions reserved for consideration be answered as follows:

But for any question of extinguishment of native title, are native title rights and interests (as defined in s 223 of the Native Title Act) held...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 cases
  • Malone v State of Queensland (The Clermont-Belyando Area Native Title Claim) (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 December 2021
    ...FCAFC 26 Sampi v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 777 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Starkey v South Australia (2018) 261 FCR 183; [2018] FCAFC 36 State of Queensland v Congoo (2015) 256 CLR 239; [2015] HCA 17 State of Western......
  • Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 September 2021
    ...Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 939 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Starkey on behalf of the Kokatha People v State of South Australia [2018] FCAFC 36; 261 FCR 183 Strickland v Western Australia [2013] FCA 677......
  • Blucher on behalf of the Gaangalu Nation People v State of Queensland (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 June 2023
    ...State of Queensland (No 2) (2015) 325 ALR 583; [2015] FCA 15 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Starkey on behalf of the Kokatha People v State of South Australia (2018) 261 FCR 183; [2018] FCAFC 36 State of Western Australia v Willis ......
  • Gardiner v Taungurung Land and Waters Council
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 February 2021
    ...v State of Western Australia [2010] FCAFC 26; 266 ALR 537 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCA 1726; 57 FCR 451 TTY167 v Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 61; 362 ALR 246 Widjabul Wia-Bal v Attorney-General of NSW......
  • Get Started for Free