Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 4)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date26 August 2022
Neutral Citation[2022] FCA 993
Date26 August 2022
CourtFederal Court

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2022] FCA 993

File number(s):



WAD 490 of 2016WAD 537 of 2018WAD 538 of 2018



Judgment of:

MORTIMER J



Date of judgment:

26 August 2022



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – consent determination – where determination made on the basis of mediation following a contested determination of a separate question – where nominated prescribed body corporate differs from that determined to hold similar native title on behalf of a similar, but not identical, common law native title holding group



Legislation:

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 22, 37M, 37N

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), ss 13(1)(a), 56(2), 57(2), 67(1), 68, 84D(4), 87, 94A, 225

Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth), r 11



Cases cited:

Commonwealth v Clifton [2007] FCAFC 90; 164 FCR 335

Drill on behalf of the Purnululu Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 1510

Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1849

Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCAFC 69; 276 FCR 203

Farrer on behalf of the Ngarrawanji Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2021] FCA 1497

Freddie v Northern Territory [2017] FCA 867

Hughes (on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People) v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 365

Jones on behalf of the Yinhawangka People v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 801

Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 2

Lander v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 427

Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474

Moses v Western Australia [2007] FCAFC 148; 160 FCR 148

Mouda on behalf of Joombarn-Buru Native Title Claimants v State of Western Australia [2021] FCA 1233

Peterson v State of Western Australia [2013] FCA 518

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 1122

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 939

Taylor on behalf of the Yamatji Nation Claim v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 42

Thudgari People v State of Western Australia [2009] FCA 1334

Ward v State of Western Australia [2006] FCA 1848

Wurrunmurra on behalf of the Bunuba People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 1480



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Western Australia



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Number of paragraphs:

59



Date of hearing:

26 August 2022





Counsel for the applicant in WAD537/2018 and WAD538/2018:

Stephen Wright SC



Solicitor for the applicant in WAD537/2019 and WAD538/2018:

Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation



Counsel for the applicant in WAD490/2016, the twelfth to fifteenth respondents in WAD537/2018 and the tenth to thirteenth respondents in WAD538/2018:

Tina Jowett



Solicitor for the applicant in WAD490/2016, the twelfth to fifteenth respondents in WAD537/2018 and the tenth to thirteenth respondents in WAD538/2018:

Cross Country Native Title Services



Counsel for the first respondent in each proceeding:

Griff Ranson SC



Solicitor for the first respondent in each proceeding:

State Solicitor’s Office



ORDERS


WAD 537 of 2018

BETWEEN:

IVAN SMIRKE, ALEC ALEXANDER AND KELLMAN LIMERICK

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondents



WAD 538 of 2018

BETWEEN:

IVAN SMIRKE, ALEC ALEXANDER AND KELLMAN LIMERICK

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondents



WAD 490 of 2016

BETWEEN:

ROY TOMMY, NANCY TOMMY, MARY MILLS & ANOR

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondents



order made by:

MORTIMER J

DATE OF ORDER:

26 AUGUST 2022



THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A. Pursuant to s 87(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), the parties have filed with the Court a Minute of Proposed Consent Determination of Native Title.

B. The Minute is in relation to an area covered by the entirety of the applications WAD 490 of 2016 and WAD 538 of 2018 (formerly WAD327/2012) and the balance of application WAD 537 of 2018 (formerly WAD6007/2000) (together, the Determination Area).

C. The Minute reflects the Court’s findings in Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 and Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 1122, and also gives effect to agreements subsequently reached by the parties in mediation and after further compromise following mediation.

D. The terms of the agreement involve the making of consent orders for a determination of native title pursuant to ss 87 and 94A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) that native title exists in relation to the land and waters of the Determination Area.

E. The parties acknowledge that the effect of the making of the determination is that the members of the native title claim groups, in accordance with the traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed by them, should be recognised as the native title holders for the Determination Area as set out in the determination.

BEING SATISFIED that a determination of native title in the terms set out in Attachment A would be within the power of the Court and, it appearing to the Court appropriate to do so, pursuant to sections 87 and 94A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and by the consent of the parties:

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. There be a determination of native title in the terms proposed in these orders, despite any actual or arguable defect in the authorisation of the applicant in WAD 490 of 2016 to seek and agree to a consent determination pursuant to s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

BY CONSENT THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. Pursuant to subsection 67(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), proceedings WAD 490 of 2016, WAD 537 of 2018 and WAD 538 of 2018 be determined together.

2. In relation to the Determination Area, there be a determination of native title in WAD 490 of 2016, WAD 537 of 2018 and WAD 538 of 2018 in the terms provided for in Attachment A (‘the determination’).

3. In respect of the Yinhawangka Area (as defined in paragraph 14 of the determination), the Gobawarrah Yinhawangka Aboriginal Corporation (ICN 9813) shall hold the determined Yinhawangka native title in trust for the Yinhawangka People pursuant to section 56(2)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

4. In respect of the Jurruru Area (as defined in paragraph 14 of the determination), the Jurruru Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC (ICN 8251) shall hold the determined Jurruru native title in trust for the Jurruru People pursuant to section 56(2)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

5. In respect of the Overlap Area (as defined in paragraph 14 of the determination), the Gobawarrah Yinhawangka...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex