‘Smith, John’ v Tasmania (State of) [TASCCA]
| Jurisdiction | Tasmania |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
| Judge | Tennent J,Porter J,Wood J |
| Judgment Date | 28 February 2012 |
| Date | 28 February 2012 |
| Docket Number | 805/2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
The Queen v Fakatounaulupe Ngata
...are more serious. See, for example, R v Freestone [at [30], Ludeman v The Queen (2010) 208 A Crim R 298 at 321; [132], Smith v Tasmania [2012] TASCCA 3 at [32], R v Edwards at [23], Shoard v Van Der Zanden at [41]. 40 Mr Ngata's attitude to the offence as noted in a Pre-Sentence Report, how......
-
Toby David Roberts v Nathan Robert Smorhun
...See, for example, R v Freestone [2009] QCA 290 at [30], Ludeman v The Queen (2010) 208 A Crim R 298 at 321; [132], Smith v Tasmania [2012] TASCCA 3 at [32], R v Edwards [2012] QCA 117 at [23], Shoard v Van Der Zanden [2013] WASC 163 at [41]. This is the not the place to consider the rationa......
-
Garret James Grimshaw v Matthew John Mann
...Refshauge J, 14 May 2013) R v TW (2011) 6 ACTLR 18 Saga v Reid [2010] ACTSC 59 Shoard v Van Der Zanden [2013] WASC 163 Smith v Tasmania [2012] TASCCA 3 Watson v Metropolitan Reception Centre (1971) 1 NSWLR 67 Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT) Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT)......
-
Daniel McElholum v Callum Andrew Hughes
...serious. See, for example, R v Freestone [2009] QCA 290 at [30], Ludeman v R (2010) 208 A Crim R 298 at 321; [132], Smith v Tasmania [2012] TASCCA 3 at [32], R v Edwards [2012] QCA 117 at [23], Shoard v Van Der Zanden [2013] WASC 163 at [41]. 376. This is, of course, not to say that assault......