Smith v Leurs
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | 1945-1022 HCA B,[1945] HCA 27 |
Year | 1945 |
Date | 1945 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
72 cases
-
Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil
...the car park is at least debatable. The men were not enticed to the car park by the appellant. They were strangers to the parties. 20 In Smith v Leurs 4, Dixon J said: ‘It is, however, exceptional to find in the law a duty to control another's actions to prevent harm to strangers. The gener......
- Lai Foh & Sons Sdn Bhd v Skrine & Company
- Faizal Arif bin Md Raffi (seorang budak yang mendakwa melalui sahabat wakil dan ibu yang sah, Rohana binti Husain) v Muhammad Fahmi bin Ibrahim and Another (Md Raffi bin Abas and Another – Third Parties)
-
King v Liverpool City Council
...referred to by the majority in the Dorset Yacht case and clearly envisaged by Dixon J. in the passage from his judgment in Smith v. Leurs, 70 C.L.R.256…. namely a relation between the defendant and the third party for whose act he is said to be responsible." 31 Lord Justice Oliver then goes......
Request a trial to view additional results