South Steyne Hotel Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2009
Neutral Citation2009-0116 FCA A
Year2009
Date2009
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 cases
  • Sensis Pty Ltd v Senses Direct Mail and Fulfillment Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 May 2019
    ...Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd (2017) 251 FCR 379; [2017] FCAFC 83 Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Ltd v Pioneer KK (2009) 176 FCR 300; [2009] FCA 13 Pioneer Hi‑Bred Corn Co v Hy-Line Chicks Pty Ltd [1978] 2 NZLR 50; [1979] RPC 410 Polo Textile Industries Pty Ltd v Domestic Textile Corp P......
3 firm's commentaries
  • GST: Can vacant land be residential premises?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 December 2011
    ...to the operation of the MPTP." The Commissioner's appeal was dismissed. Footnotes 1 Vidler v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] 74 ATR 520 2 [2009] FCA 13; (2009) 71 ATR 228 at para 31 3 [2004] FCAFC 307; (2004) 141 FCR 299 4 para 13 5 para 22 6 para 22 7 para 28 8 paras 46 and The content of ......
  • Court Clarifies Residential Premises Test
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 February 2009
    ...estate qualifies as 'residential premises' is very important. The Federal Court in South Steyne Hotels Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCA 13 considered the GST characterisation of various supplies involving apartment rooms at the Sebel Manly Beach Hotel complex. Leasing the resid......
  • Reinforcing the divide: commercial residential premises and South Steyne
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 December 2011
    ...The Commissioner is considering the impact of the South Steyne decision on GSTR 2008/1 and GSTR 2004/4. Footnotes 1 [2009] FCAFC 155. 2 [2009] FCA 13. 3 (2004) 141 FCR 4 Note that the facts of South Steyne and the decision of the Federal Court have been the subject of a previous case note i......