Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date04 November 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 1357
CourtFederal Court
Date04 November 2021
Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim) [2021] FCA 1357


Federal Court of Australia


Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim) [2021] FCA 1357

File number:

SAD 76 of 2021

SAD 71 of 2016



Judgment of:

CHARLESWORTH J



Date of judgment:

4 November 2021



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – native title determination application made in respect of land and waters in the vicinity of the Great Australian Bight – claim group defined in a way that excludes some descendants of named apical ancestors but not others – descendants of the same apical ancestors previously determined to acknowledge the same traditional laws and to observe the same traditional customs – consideration of whether the claim group is a properly constituted claim group for the purposes of s 61 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – consideration of the traditional decision-making law, taking the claimant’s evidence at its highest – consideration of whether the claim group is a distinct society – claim not authorised as required by s 61 – whether the Court should permit the claim to proceed to trial notwithstanding the defect in authorisation


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – native title determination application overlapping a series of existing claims in respect of the same land and waters – existing claims having a long procedural history – existing claims subject to adjudication of a single disputed issue – existing claims to promptly proceed to a consent determination in the usual course – consideration of the impact of the recently commenced overlapping claim – overlapping claim summarily dismissed as an abuse of process



Legislation:

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 61, 62, 64, 67, 68, 84, 84C, 84D, 87, 87A, 94A, 223, 225, 251B, 253

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A



Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01



Cases cited:

Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77

Bolton on behalf of the Southern Noongar Families v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 760

Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 638

Buurabalayji Thalanyji Aboriginal Corporation v Onslow Salt Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 978

Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia (No 2) [2016] FCA 724

District Council of Streaky Bay v Wilson [2021] FCAFC 181

Drury v Western Australia (2020) 276 FCR 203

Far West Coast Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1468

Far West Coast Native Title Claim v South Australia (2011) 191 FCR 381

Far West Coast Native Title Claim v South Australia (No 2) (2012) 204 FCR 542

Far West Coast Native Title Claim v State of South Australia (No 6) [2013] FCA 1270

Far West Coast Native Title Claim v State of South Australia (No 7) [2013] FCA 1285

Fourmile on behalf of the Gimuy Walubara Yidinji People v Queensland [2018] FCA 572

Garrett, in the matter of Company One [2016] FCA 703

Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v State of Western Australia (No 9) [2007] FCA 31; 238 ALR 1

Jango v Northern Territory (2007) 159 FCR 531

Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd (2008) 167 FCR 372

Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 75

KD (deceased) on behalf of the Mirning People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2017] FCA 1225

Kite v State of South Australia [2007] FCA 1662

Landers v South Australia (2003) 128 FCR 495

Miller v State of South Australia (Far West Coast Sea Claim) (No 2) [2018] FCA 599

Risk v Native Title Tribunal [2000] FCA 1589

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 1122

Stock on behalf of the Nyiyaparli People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2018] FCA 1370

Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77



Walker on behalf of The Noonukul of Minjerrabah v State of Queensland [2007] FCA 967

Williams v Grant [2004] FCAFC 178

Wilson v State of South Australia (No 3) [2019] FCA 1150

Wilson v State of South Australia (No 4) [2020] FCA 1805

Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422



Division:

General Division



Registry:

South Australia



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Number of paragraphs:

267



Date of last submission:

First Respondent: 17 September 2021



Date of hearing:

2 September 2021, 3 September 2021



SAD 76 of 2021


Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr D Billington with Mr J Roder



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Triple BL Legal



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr W Ambrose



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Crown Solicitor’s Office



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Ms R Webb QC with Ms A Bond



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Counsel for the Third and Fourth Respondents:

Ms S Phillips with Ms A Sibree



Solicitor for the Third and Fourth Respondents:

South Australian Native Title Services



SAD 71 of 2016


Counsel for the Applicant:

Ms T Jowett with Mr C Gregory



Solicitor for the Applicant:

South Australian Native Title Services

Counsel for the State of South Australia:

Mr W Ambrose



Solicitor for the State of South Australia:

Crown Solicitor’s Office



Counsel for the Commonwealth of Australia:

Ms R Webb QC with Ms A Bond



Solicitor for the Commonwealth of Australia:

Australian Government...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Wilson on behalf of the Wirangu People v South Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 19 Julio 2022
    ...of the Gunggari People) v State of Queensland [2002] FCA 486 Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim) [2021] FCA 1357 Starkey v South Australia (2011) 193 FCR 450 Sumner v South Australia [2014] FCA 534 TR (Decd) on behalf of Kariyarra - Pipingarra People v St......
  • Wilson, on behalf of the Wirangu People v State of South Australia (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 8 Diciembre 2022
    ...Part A claim area. That claim was dismissed on 4 November 2021: Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim) [2021] FCA 1357.10 Finally, as regards the history of these claims, on 18 May 2021 the applicant filed the application in the Wirangu Sea Claim No 2. That ......