Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 04 November 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 1357 |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Date | 04 November 2021 |
Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim) [2021] FCA 1357
|
File number: |
SAD 76 of 2021 SAD 71 of 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Judgment of: |
CHARLESWORTH J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
4 November 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
NATIVE TITLE – native title determination application made in respect of land and waters in the vicinity of the Great Australian Bight – claim group defined in a way that excludes some descendants of named apical ancestors but not others – descendants of the same apical ancestors previously determined to acknowledge the same traditional laws and to observe the same traditional customs – consideration of whether the claim group is a properly constituted claim group for the purposes of s 61 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – consideration of the traditional decision-making law, taking the claimant’s evidence at its highest – consideration of whether the claim group is a distinct society – claim not authorised as required by s 61 – whether the Court should permit the claim to proceed to trial notwithstanding the defect in authorisation
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – native title determination application overlapping a series of existing claims in respect of the same land and waters – existing claims having a long procedural history – existing claims subject to adjudication of a single disputed issue – existing claims to promptly proceed to a consent determination in the usual course – consideration of the impact of the recently commenced overlapping claim – overlapping claim summarily dismissed as an abuse of process |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 61, 62, 64, 67, 68, 84, 84C, 84D, 87, 87A, 94A, 223, 225, 251B, 253 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01 |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77 Bolton on behalf of the Southern Noongar Families v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 760 Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 638 Buurabalayji Thalanyji Aboriginal Corporation v Onslow Salt Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 978 Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia (No 2) [2016] FCA 724 District Council of Streaky Bay v Wilson [2021] FCAFC 181 Drury v Western Australia (2020) 276 FCR 203 Far West Coast Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1468 Far West Coast Native Title Claim v South Australia (2011) 191 FCR 381 Far West Coast Native Title Claim v South Australia (No 2) (2012) 204 FCR 542 Far West Coast Native Title Claim v State of South Australia (No 6) [2013] FCA 1270 Far West Coast Native Title Claim v State of South Australia (No 7) [2013] FCA 1285 Fourmile on behalf of the Gimuy Walubara Yidinji People v Queensland [2018] FCA 572 Garrett, in the matter of Company One [2016] FCA 703 Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v State of Western Australia (No 9) [2007] FCA 31; 238 ALR 1 Jango v Northern Territory (2007) 159 FCR 531 Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd (2008) 167 FCR 372 Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 75 KD (deceased) on behalf of the Mirning People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2017] FCA 1225 Kite v State of South Australia [2007] FCA 1662 Landers v South Australia (2003) 128 FCR 495 Miller v State of South Australia (Far West Coast Sea Claim) (No 2) [2018] FCA 599 Risk v Native Title Tribunal [2000] FCA 1589 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728 Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 1122 Stock on behalf of the Nyiyaparli People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2018] FCA 1370 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507 UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77 Walker on behalf of The Noonukul of Minjerrabah v State of Queensland [2007] FCA 967 Williams v Grant [2004] FCAFC 178 Wilson v State of South Australia (No 3) [2019] FCA 1150 Wilson v State of South Australia (No 4) [2020] FCA 1805 Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422 |
|
|
|
|
Division: |
|
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
267 |
|
|
|
|
Date of last submission: |
First Respondent: 17 September 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
2 September 2021, 3 September 2021 |
|
|
|
|
SAD 76 of 2021 |
|
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
Mr D Billington with Mr J Roder |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicant: |
Triple BL Legal |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the First Respondent: |
Mr W Ambrose |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the First Respondent: |
Crown Solicitor’s Office |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Second Respondent: |
Ms R Webb QC with Ms A Bond |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: |
Australian Government Solicitor |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Third and Fourth Respondents: |
Ms S Phillips with Ms A Sibree |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Third and Fourth Respondents: |
South Australian Native Title Services |
|
|
|
|
SAD 71 of 2016 |
|
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
Ms T Jowett with Mr C Gregory |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicant: |
South Australian Native Title Services |
|
Counsel for the State of South Australia: |
Mr W Ambrose |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the State of South Australia: |
Crown Solicitor’s Office |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Commonwealth of Australia: |
Ms R Webb QC with Ms A Bond |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Commonwealth of Australia: |
Australian Government... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Wilson on behalf of the Wirangu People v South Australia
...of the Gunggari People) v State of Queensland [2002] FCA 486 Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim) [2021] FCA 1357 Starkey v South Australia (2011) 193 FCR 450 Sumner v South Australia [2014] FCA 534 TR (Decd) on behalf of Kariyarra - Pipingarra People v St......
-
Wilson, on behalf of the Wirangu People v State of South Australia (No 2)
...Part A claim area. That claim was dismissed on 4 November 2021: Sparrow v State of South Australia (Mirning Eastern Sea and Land Claim) [2021] FCA 1357.10 Finally, as regards the history of these claims, on 18 May 2021 the applicant filed the application in the Wirangu Sea Claim No 2. That ......