Spratt v Hermes
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Court | High Court |
Neutral Citation | 1965-1206 HCA A,[1965] HCA 66 |
Date | 1965 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
51 cases
12 books & journal articles
-
The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
...Ltd v Western Australia (2003) 217 CLR 30, 83 [143](Kirby J). This term was also used, with different inflections, in Spratt v Hermes (1965) 114 CLR 226,246–7 (Barwick CJ); Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1983) 152 CLR 328, 346(Murphy J); R v Burgess; Ex parte Henry (1936) 5......
-
Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
...J), 606–7 (Gummow J). 134 GPAO (1999) 196 CLR 553, 602 (Gaudron J); Gould v Brown (1998) 193 CLR 346, 426–8 (McHugh J); Spratt v Hermes (1965) 114 CLR 226, 274 (Windeyer J); see also Eastman (1999) 200 CLR 322, 337 (Gaudron J), 354 (Kirby J); Australian Law Reform Commission, above n 11, 62......
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...a more inclusive approach to s 122: Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1945) 71 CLR 29, 84–5. 13 Spratt v Hermes (1965) 114 CLR 226; Capital TV and Appliances Pty Ltd v Falconer (1971) 125 CLR 591; Capital Duplicators Pty Ltd v Australian Capital Territory (1992) 177 CL......
-
Due Process, Judicial Power and Chapter III in the New High Court
...(Black CJ and Hely J), 732 (Drummond J) rejecting an argument that Kable applies to territory courts. This was because Spratt v Hermes (1965) 114 CLR 226 and Capital TV and Appliances Pty Ltd v Falconer (1971) 125 CLR 591 established that territory courts do not exercise federal jurisdictio......
Request a trial to view additional results