Staatz v Berry, in the matter of Wollumbin Horizons Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Judge | DERRINGTON J |
| Judgment Date | 20 June 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] FCA 924 |
| Date | 20 June 2019 |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Staatz v Berry, in the matter of Wollumbin Horizons Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 924
|
File number: |
QUD 32 of 2018 |
|
|
|
|
Judge: |
DERRINGTON J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
20 June 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
CORPORATIONS – liquidation – court orders or directions in winding up as to manner in which trust property is to be applied – company holding land on constructive trust
TRUSTS – constructive trusts – company promoted scheme to establish commune – subscribers to have beneficial interest in land by unit in unit trust – unit trust fails and commune fails – directions as to beneficial interest in land – more subscribers in value than value in land
CORPORATIONS – winding up – costs expenses and remuneration of liquidator of corporate trustee where trust not sole activity of company – where limited right of indemnity |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
13 Coromandel Place Pty Ltd v CL Custodians Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 30 ACSR 377 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 17) (2011) 286 ALR 346 Bannister v Bannister [1948] 2 All ER 133 Bathurst City Council v PWC Properties Pty Ltd (1998) 195 CLR 566 Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Bennett v Horgan (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Bryson J, 4056 of 1991, 3 June 1994) Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan [1995] Ch 211 Black Uhlans Incorporated v Crime Commission [2002] NSWSC 1060 Bloch v Bloch (1981) 180 CLR 390 Boyce v Boyce (1849) 16 Sim 476 Brown v Heffer (1967) 116 CLR 344 Bryson v Bryant (1992) 29 NSWLR 188 Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 Carson v Wood (1994) 34 NSWLR 9 Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth [2019] HCA 20 Central Trust and Safe Deposit Co v Snider [1916] 1 AC 266 CGU Insurance Limited v One.Tel Limited (In Liquidation) (2010) 242 CLR 174 Dean v Aylward [2017] NSWSC 972 Drake v Whipp [1996] 1 FLR 826 Dyer v Dyer (1788) 30 ER 42 (Ch) Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Foskett v McKeown [1998] Ch 265 Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101 Goodfriend v Goodfriend [1972] SCR 640 Halloran v Minister Administering National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (2006) 229 CLR 545 Helou v Nguyen [2014] NSWSC 22 Howard v Miller [1915] AC 318 Imam Ali Islamic Centre v Imam Ali Islamic Centre [2018] VSC 413 John Alexander’s Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1 Jones (Liquidator) v Matrix Partners Pty Ltd, in the matter of Killarnee Civil & Concrete Contractors Pty Ltd (in liq) (2018) 354 ALR 436 Jones v Kernott [2010] 1 WLR 2401 Korda v Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd (2015) 255 CLR 62 Krejci (liquidator), in the matter of Community Work Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] FCA 425 Lane (trustee), in the matter of Lee (bankrupt) v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2017] 253 FCR 46 Legal Services Board v Gillespie-Jones (2013) 249 CLR 493 Lucas v Lucas [2018] NSWSC 962 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church v His Eminence Petar the Diocesan Bishop of Macedonian Orthodox Diocese (2008) 237 CLR 66 Munro v Munro [2018] VSC 747 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Oughtred v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1960] AC 206; [1958] Ch 383 Papas v Co [2018] NSWSC 1404 Re Amerind Pty Ltd; Commonwealth v Byrnes and Hewitt (2018) 54 VR 230 Re Berkeley Applegate (Investment Consultants) Ltd (in liq) [1989] Ch 32 Re Hallett’s Estate; Knatchbull v Hallett (1879) 13 Ch D 696 Re Mackie Group Pty Ltd (in liq) (2017) 122 ACSR 537 Re Universal Distributing Co (in liq) (1933) 48 CLR 171 RWG Management Ltd v Commissioner for Corporate Affairs (Vic) [1984] VR 385 Scott v Scott (1963) 109 CLR 649 Shalson v Russo [2005] Ch 281 Silvia (Trustee) v Williams, in the matter of Williams (Bankrupt) [2018] FCA 189 Sivritas v Sivritas [2008] VSC 374 Smith, in the matter of Buddy Management Pty Ltd (in liq) v Buddy Management Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 566 Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432 Stavrianakos v Western Australia [2016] WASC 64 Widmer v Imagination Enterprises Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of Western Australia, Bredmeyer M, CIV 1126 of 1999, 9 April 1999) Woodgate, in the matter of Bell Hire Services Pty Ltd (in liq) [2016] FCA 1583 Youyang Pty Ltd v Minter Ellison Morris Fletcher (2003) 212 CLR 484 |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
3 December 2018, 4 December 2018, 5 December 2018 and 25 February 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
|
|
|
|
|
Division: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Category: |
Catchwords |
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
225 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Plaintiff: |
Mr C Jennings |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: |
Patane Lawyers |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the First Defendant: |
The first defendant appeared in person |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Second Defendant: |
The second defendant did not appear |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Defendants: |
Mr JM Manner |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Defendants: |
Mark Swivel Legal |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Seventh Defendant: |
The seventh defendant appeared in person |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Eighth Defendant: |
The eighth defendant appeared in person |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Ninth Defendant: |
The ninth defendant appeared in person |
ORDERS
|
|
QUD 32 of 2018 |
|
|
IN THE MATTER OF WOLLUMBIN HORIZONS PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 606 581 364 |
||
|
BETWEEN: |
STEVEN NEVILLE STAATZ AS... |
|
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Marco (No 9)
...99 Re Sutherland [2004] NSWSC 798; (2004) 50 ACSR 297 Shiu Shing Sze Tu v Lowe [2014] NSWCA 462; (2014) NSWLR 317 Staatz v Berry (No 3) [2019] FCA 924; (2019) 138 ACSR 231 Tang v Wright (No 3) [2020] FCA 1122 Trio Capital Limited (Admin App) v ACT Superannuation Management Pty Ltd [2010] NS......
-
Lawrence, in the matter of Ozifin Tech Pty Ltd (in liq) v AGM Markets Pty Ltd (in liq)
...Caledonia Travel Service Pty Ltd (in liq) (2003) 59 NSWLR 361 Shannon v JMA Accounting Pty Ltd [2005] QSC 240 Staatz v Berry (No 3) (2019) 138 ACSR 231 Templeton v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2015) 108 ACSR 545 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Bo......
-
Micheletto (Trustee), in the matter of the El-Debel (Bankrupt) v El-Debel
...HCA 11; (2011) 243 CLR 361 Lucas v Lucas [2018] NSWSC 962 Staatz v Berry, in the matter of Wollumbin Horizons Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 924; 138 ACSR 231 Tonna v Mendonca [2019] NSWSC 1849 Trkulja v Markovic [2015] VSCA 298; (2015) 49 VR 402 Varma v Varma [2010] NSWSC 786 Date of h......
-
Carrello, in the matter of Gembrook Investments Pty Ltd (in liq)
...Distributing Co Ltd (in liq) [1933] HCA 2; (1933) 48 CLR 171 Staatz v Berry, in the matter of Wollumbin Horizons Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 924 Taylor (Liquidator) v CJ & KL Bond Super Pty Ltd (Trustee), in the matter of CJ & KL Bond Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] FCA 1430 Walley, in the m......
-
CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND DISCRETION IN AUSTRALIA: TAKING STOCK.
...parties', the plaintiff was entitled to relief: at 617 (emphasis added). (49) Trajkoski (n 48) [28]. See also Staatz v Berry [No 3] (2019) 138 ACSR 231, 276 [166] (Derrington J) ('Staatz'), citing Imam AH Islamic Centre v Imam AH Islamic Centre Inc [2018] VSC 413, [402]-[405] (McMillan J) (......