Stambe v Minister for Health
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | MORTIMER J |
| Judgment Date | 29 January 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] FCA 43 |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Date | 29 January 2019 |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43
|
|
|
|
File number: |
VID 1399 of 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Judge: |
MORTIMER J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
29 January 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for review of exercise of Ministerial discretion pursuant to s 90A(2) of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) granting approval to supply pharmaceutical benefits at particular premises – whether procedures required by law to be observed were not observed – whether Minister failed to consider comments, information and documents provided by applicant pursuant to invitation by Minister to do so – where Minister’s consideration informed by Ministerial briefing note – where Minister adopted draft reasons prepared by departmental staff subsequent to exercise of discretion – consideration of availability of inferences concerning which materials read by Minister – in the circumstances, Minister failed to consider materials provided by applicant – application allowed on ground one
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for review of exercise of Ministerial discretion pursuant to s 90A(2) of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) granting approval to supply pharmaceutical benefits at particular premises – whether Minister failed to take into consideration relevant considerations or took into account irrelevant considerations – matters raised by applicant were neither irrelevant nor mandatory considerations – whether Minister’s decision involved an error of law in definition of “community” adopted – no error in definition adopted by Minister – grounds two and three dismissed
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – consideration of scope of Ministerial discretion pursuant to s 90A(2) of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) – interpretation of scope of Minister’s obligation under s 90D(3) of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) to consider comments, information or documents provided by a person at Minister’s invitation |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Constitution Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5(1)(b), 5(1)(e), 5(1)(f), 5(2)(a), 5(2)(b), 13 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37N Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501(3), 501G(1)(e) National Health Act 1953 (Cth) ss 90, 90A, 90B, s 90D, 99L, Part VII Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Part IIIA |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
Anderson v Director-General of the Department of Environmental and Climate Change [2008] NSWCA 337; 251 ALR 633 Angelos v Minister for Health [2014] FCA 706; 226 FCR 275 Assarapin v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2016] FCAFC 9; 239 FCR 161 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; 247 CLR 345 Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83; 231 FCR 513 Bat Advocacy NSW Inc v Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts [2011] FCAFC 59 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; 252 FCR 352 Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd [1940] AC 152; [1939] 3 All ER 722 Chetcuti v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 477 CRI026 v Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 19; 355 ALR 216 Folau v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 214; 256 FCR 455 Hanna v Minister for Health [2013] FCA 303 Hooton v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCAFC 142 Hope v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2016] FCA 1597 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802; 233 FCR 136 Javillonar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 854; 114 FCR 311 Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1987] FCA 457; 14 ALD 291 Kong v Minister for Health [2014] FCAFC 149; 227 FCR 215 Maxwell v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 47; 249 FCR 275 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 357 ALR 408 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274; 106 FCR 426 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; 205 CLR 507 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v W157/00A [2002] FCAFC 281; 125 FCR 433 Murray v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2017] FCA 705 Navarrete v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1723 NBMT v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 508; 128 ALD 119 Nezovic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2003] FCA 1263; 133 FCR 190 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36; 246 CLR 379 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 41; 243 CLR 319 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd [2018] HCA 4; 351 ALR 225 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness [2000] NSWCA 29; 49 NSWLR 262 Stirling v Minister for Finance [2017] FCA 874 Swift v SAS Trustee Corporation [2010] NSWCA 182 Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCA 987; 57 FCR 451 Walkerden v Wodonga Pharmacy Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 273; 230 FCR 243 Yu v Minister for Health [2013] FCA 261; 216 FCR 168
|
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
2 August 2018 |
|
|
|
|
Date of last submissions: |
17 August 2018 |
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
|
|
|
|
|
Division: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights |
|
|
|
|
Category: |
Catchwords |
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
181 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
Mr C J Gunson SC and Ms R Howe |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicant: |
Robert James Lawyers |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the First Respondent: |
The First Respondent filed a submitting notice save as to costs |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Second Respondent: |
Mr B Lim |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: |
Mr D E Raftesath of Meridian Lawyers |
ORDERS
|
|
VID 1399 of 2017 |
|
|
|
||
|
BETWEEN: |
DOMINIC STAMBE Applicant
|
|
|
AND: |
MINISTER FOR HEALTH First Respondent
YL HEALTH GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 602 917 742) Second Respondent
|
|
|
JUDGE: |
MORTIMER J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
29 January... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
BFM16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
...Pty Ltd v MacKellar [1981] FCA 191; (1981) 38 ALR 363 Sowa v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 111 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43; (2019) 270 FCR 173 Plaintiff M61/2010E v The Commonwealth [2010] HCA 41; 243 CLR 319 Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizens......
-
McQueen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 3)
...and Border Protection [2014] HCA 24; (2014) 255 CLR 179 QJMV v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 136 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43; (2019) 270 FCR 173 Tervonen v Minister for Justice and Customs (No 2) [2007] FCA 1684 Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451 Tohi v Minister for I......
-
Roberts v Attorney-General (Cth)
...[2003] HCA 56; (2003) 216 CLR 212 Roncevich v Repatriation Commission [2005] HCA 40; (2005) 222 CLR 115 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43; (2019) 270 FCR 173 Stephens v Attorney-General [2021] FCA 204 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] ......
-
Stambe v Minister for Health (No 2)
...[2001] HCA 51; 207 CLR 391 Sigma Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wyeth [2018] FCA 1556; 136 IPR 8 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43 Wattmaster Alco Pty Ltd v Button [1986] FCA 446; 13 FCR 253 Yu v Minister for Health (No 2) [2013] FCA 367; 216 FCR 188 Date of hearing: 6 March......
-
'The Idea of Perfection' ' when is your administrative decision truly complete?
...of "unreasonableness" in decision-making and a decision not having been made at all. In the 2019 case of Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43, the Federal Court found that despite the Minister's signature on a record of decision, there was no actual evidence that the Minister had turn......