Stambe v Minister for Health

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeMORTIMER J
Judgment Date29 January 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 43
CourtFederal Court
Date29 January 2019
Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43



File number:

VID 1399 of 2017



Judge:

MORTIMER J



Date of judgment:

29 January 2019



Catchwords:

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for review of exercise of Ministerial discretion pursuant to s 90A(2) of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) granting approval to supply pharmaceutical benefits at particular premises – whether procedures required by law to be observed were not observed – whether Minister failed to consider comments, information and documents provided by applicant pursuant to invitation by Minister to do so – where Minister’s consideration informed by Ministerial briefing note – where Minister adopted draft reasons prepared by departmental staff subsequent to exercise of discretion – consideration of availability of inferences concerning which materials read by Minister – in the circumstances, Minister failed to consider materials provided by applicant – application allowed on ground one


ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for review of exercise of Ministerial discretion pursuant to s 90A(2) of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) granting approval to supply pharmaceutical benefits at particular premises – whether Minister failed to take into consideration relevant considerations or took into account irrelevant considerations – matters raised by applicant were neither irrelevant nor mandatory considerations – whether Minister’s decision involved an error of law in definition of “community” adopted – no error in definition adopted by Minister – grounds two and three dismissed


STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – consideration of scope of Ministerial discretion pursuant to s 90A(2) of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) – interpretation of scope of Minister’s obligation under s 90D(3) of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) to consider comments, information or documents provided by a person at Minister’s invitation



Legislation:

Constitution

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth)

Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5(1)(b), 5(1)(e), 5(1)(f), 5(2)(a), 5(2)(b), 13

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37N

Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501(3), 501G(1)(e)

National Health Act 1953 (Cth) ss 90, 90A, 90B, s 90D, 99L, Part VII

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Part IIIA



Cases cited:

Anderson v Director-General of the Department of Environmental and Climate Change [2008] NSWCA 337; 251 ALR 633

Angelos v Minister for Health [2014] FCA 706; 226 FCR 275

Assarapin v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2016] FCAFC 9; 239 FCR 161

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; 247 CLR 345

Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83; 231 FCR 513

Bat Advocacy NSW Inc v Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts [2011] FCAFC 59

Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; 252 FCR 352

Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd [1940] AC 152; [1939] 3 All ER 722

Chetcuti v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 477

CRI026 v Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 19; 355 ALR 216

Folau v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 214; 256 FCR 455

Hanna v Minister for Health [2013] FCA 303

Hooton v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCAFC 142

Hope v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2016] FCA 1597

Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802; 233 FCR 136

Javillonar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 854; 114 FCR 311

Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1987] FCA 457; 14 ALD 291

Kong v Minister for Health [2014] FCAFC 149; 227 FCR 215

Maxwell v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 47; 249 FCR 275

Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 357 ALR 408

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; 243 CLR 164

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274; 106 FCR 426

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; 205 CLR 507

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v W157/00A [2002] FCAFC 281; 125 FCR 433

Murray v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2017] FCA 705

Navarrete v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1723

NBMT v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 508; 128 ALD 119

Nezovic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2003] FCA 1263; 133 FCR 190

Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36; 246 CLR 379

Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth [2010] HCA 41; 243 CLR 319

Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd [2018] HCA 4; 351 ALR 225

Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness [2000] NSWCA 29; 49 NSWLR 262

Stirling v Minister for Finance [2017] FCA 874

Swift v SAS Trustee Corporation [2010] NSWCA 182

Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCA 987; 57 FCR 451

Walkerden v Wodonga Pharmacy Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 273; 230 FCR 243

Yu v Minister for Health [2013] FCA 261; 216 FCR 168




Date of hearing:

2 August 2018



Date of last submissions:

17 August 2018



Registry:

Victoria



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

181



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr C J Gunson SC and Ms R Howe



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Robert James Lawyers



Counsel for the First Respondent:

The First Respondent filed a submitting notice save as to costs



Counsel for the Second Respondent:

Mr B Lim



Solicitor for the Second Respondent:

Mr D E Raftesath of Meridian Lawyers



ORDERS


VID 1399 of 2017

BETWEEN:

DOMINIC STAMBE

Applicant


AND:

MINISTER FOR HEALTH

First Respondent


YL HEALTH GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 602 917 742)

Second Respondent



JUDGE:

MORTIMER J

DATE OF ORDER:

29 January...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • BFM16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • March 31, 2021
    ...Pty Ltd v MacKellar [1981] FCA 191; (1981) 38 ALR 363 Sowa v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 111 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43; (2019) 270 FCR 173 Plaintiff M61/2010E v The Commonwealth [2010] HCA 41; 243 CLR 319 Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizens......
  • McQueen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • March 23, 2022
    ...and Border Protection [2014] HCA 24; (2014) 255 CLR 179 QJMV v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 136 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43; (2019) 270 FCR 173 Tervonen v Minister for Justice and Customs (No 2) [2007] FCA 1684 Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451 Tohi v Minister for I......
  • Roberts v Attorney-General (Cth)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • May 18, 2022
    ...[2003] HCA 56; (2003) 216 CLR 212 Roncevich v Repatriation Commission [2005] HCA 40; (2005) 222 CLR 115 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43; (2019) 270 FCR 173 Stephens v Attorney-General [2021] FCA 204 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] ......
  • Stambe v Minister for Health (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • April 10, 2019
    ...[2001] HCA 51; 207 CLR 391 Sigma Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wyeth [2018] FCA 1556; 136 IPR 8 Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43 Wattmaster Alco Pty Ltd v Button [1986] FCA 446; 13 FCR 253 Yu v Minister for Health (No 2) [2013] FCA 367; 216 FCR 188 Date of hearing: 6 March......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • 'The Idea of Perfection' ' when is your administrative decision truly complete?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • February 23, 2024
    ...of "unreasonableness" in decision-making and a decision not having been made at all. In the 2019 case of Stambe v Minister for Health [2019] FCA 43, the Federal Court found that despite the Minister's signature on a record of decision, there was no actual evidence that the Minister had turn......