State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in Liquidation)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Neutral Citation | [1999] HCA 3,1999-0209 HCA D |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
422 cases
- Commissioner of Taxation v Amway of Australia Ltd
- Hamden v Secretary, Department of Human Services
-
Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon
...that it appears to be (or is stated to be) based on credibility findings 9. Such was the case in State Rail Authority (NSW) v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (In Liq)10 (‘ SRA ‘). There a witness, disbelieved by the primary judge, was supported by contemporaneous documentary evidence and u......
- Cordelia Holdings Pty Ltd v Newkey Investments Pty Ltd
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study
...to Samuels JA in Trawl Industries Pty Ltd v Effem Foods Pty Ltd (1992) 27 NSWLR 326, 328 (Samuel JA) ('Trawl') and n oting also SRA (1999) 160 ALR 588, 617–18. The SRA case was also referred to by Kirby J in Suvaal v Cessnock City Council (2003) 200 ALR 1, 19 [73]; Rosenberg v Percival (200......
-
Retreating to the History of Judicial Review?
...legitimacy; see, eg, Mashaw, above n 13, 1362]. 102. See, eg, State Rail Authority (NSW) v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588, 609–10 [72]–[74]; Eastman v R (2000) 203 CLR 1, 11 [14], 85–9 [257]–[267]; Lacey v A-G (Qld) (2011)242 CLR 573, 596 [56]; Perara-Cathcart v......
-
Asylum Adjudication, Mental Health and Credibility Evaluation*
...known facts, is worth pounds of demeanour': see, eg, State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (In Liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588, Kirby J at [88] (who notes, 'The studies of experimental psychologists since that time have confirmed the danger of placing undue relia......