Stenhouse v Coleman
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1944-1206 HCA A,[1944] HCA 36 |
| Date | 1944 |
| Year | 1944 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
34 cases
- Higgins v Commonwealth
- Illawarra District County Council v Wickham
- Cunliffe v Commonwealth
-
Thomas v Mowbray and Ors
...s 51(vi) of the Constitution ensures that the demonstration of sufficient constitutional facts is paramount for its engagement 245. In Stenhouse v Coleman246, Dixon J affirmed that the phrase ‘“a law with respect to the defence of the Commonwealth” is an expression which seems rather to tre......
Get Started for Free
13 books & journal articles
-
Grounding the High Court's Modern Section 92 Jurisprudence: The case for Improper Purpose as the Touchstone
...States Relevant for Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation?' (2000) 85 Cornell Law Review 1609. 122 See Stenho use v Coleman (1944) 69 CLR 457, 471 (Dixon J); Richardson v Forestry Commission (1988) 164 CLR 261, 311 (Deane J). 123 For instance, 'intentions' are susceptible of various g......
-
Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
...Affairs Commission (NSW) v Yuill (1991) 172 CLR 319, 321–2 (Brennan J), 339–40 (Gaudron J), 346 (McHugh J); Stenhouse v Coleman (1944) 69 CLR 457, 471 (Dixon J). Another way of expressing the idea of objective intention or purpose is by reference to the 'mischief' which a law addresses: see......
-
The Race Power — Its Replacement and Interpretation
...Pape v Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 238 CLR 1, w hile not overruling this test, have not applied it either. 105 Stenhouse v Coleman (1944) 69 CLR 457, 470 (Dixon J). 106 Polyukhovich v Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501, 593 (Brennan J). 107 Stenhouse v Coleman (1944) 69 CLR 457, 471 (Dixon......
-
Can Parliament Confer Plenary Executive Power? the Limitations Imposed by Sections 51 and 52 of the Australian Consitution
...135 See further Public Service Association of SA v Industrial Relations Commission of SA (1991) 173 CLR 132. 136 Stenhouse v Coleman (1944) 69 CLR 457, 472 (Dixon J). 137 Jeremy Kirk, ‘Constitutional Guarantees, Characterisation and the Concept of Proportionality’ (1997) 21 Melbourne Univer......
Get Started for Free