Steven Adam Weston v Nicholas Mehmet Arley

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
JudgeRefshauge ACJ
Judgment Date20 August 2012
Docket NumberNo. SCA 117 of 2011
CourtSupreme Court of ACT
Date20 August 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • R v Degioannis
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 1 March 2019
    ...550 R v SAG [2004] QCA 286; 147 A Crim R 301 R v Toumo'ua [2017] ACTCA 9; 265 A Crim R 499 Van Zwam v R [2017] NSWCCA 127 Weston v Arley [2012] ACTSC 138 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4; 96 NSWLR 1 Zdravkovic v The Queen [2016] ACTCA 53 Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) ss 54, 56, 64, 65 Cr......
  • The Queen(Crown) v Troy William Eyles
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 3 January 2017
    ...ACTSC 140 R v RM [2013] ACTSC 289 R v Sordini [2015] ACTSC 45 R v Spencer [2014] ACTSC 364 R v Wilkins [2015] ACTSC 145 Weston v Arley [2012] ACTSC 138 Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (ACT), s 55(2) Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT), s 110 Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005, ss 7......
  • The Queen v Thomas Carney
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 30 July 2015
    ...Carney [2013] ACTSC 266 R v Carney (No 2) [2014] ACTSC 61 R v Marston (1993) 60 SASR 320 Saga v Reid [2010] ACTSC 59 Weston v Arley [2012] ACTSC 138 Legislation Cited: Crime (Sentence Administration) Act (ACT) s 110 Crime (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 Crime (Sentencing) Act 2005 (A......
  • Erin Byrne v Gary William Mingay
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 5 June 2014
    ...Crim R 102 R v Hoang (2002) 128 A Crim R 422 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Talukder v Dunbar (2009) 194 A Crim R 545 Weston v Arley [2012] ACTSC 138 Child Protection (Offender Reporting) Act 2004 (Qld) Crimes (Child Sex Offenders) Act 2005 (ACT), ss 8, 11, 37, 54, 59, Pt 3.3 Crimes (Ch......
  • Get Started for Free