Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Companypty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1986-0213 HCA A,[1986] HCA 1
Date1986
Year1986
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
220 cases
26 firm's commentaries
9 books & journal articles
  • The site
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...to third parties for the “extra hazardous” work of his contractor has seemingly been rejected: Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLr 16 at 30; Transield Services (Australia) Pty Ltd v Hall [2008] NSWCa 294. In Fox v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCa 23 at [52] it w......
  • Case Note: ESTABLISHING A DUTY OF CARE: SINGAPORE’S SINGLE, TWO-STAGE TEST
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...UNSW Law Journal 697 at 713. 118 Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 at 628. 119 (2005) 28(3) UNSW Law Journal 697. 120 (1986) 160 CLR 16. 121 (2005) 28(3) UNSW Law Journal 697 at 699. 122 (2005) 28(3) UNSW Law Journal 697 at 699. 123 (1998) 192 CLR 330 at 414. 124 (2005) 28(3) ......
  • Employment status of the police in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 27 No. 1, April 2003
    • 1 April 2003
    ...(19) [1930] 2 KB 364 ('Fisher'). (20) See, eg, Zuijs v Wirth Brothers Pty Ltd (1955) 93 CLR 561; Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16. (21) This issue is adverted to generally in Oceanic Crest Shipping Co Pty Ltd v Pilbara Habour Services Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 626 ('Ocean......
  • CONTRACTUAL AUTONOMY, PUBLIC POLICY AND THE PROTECTIVE DOMAIN OF LABOUR LAW.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 2, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...above nn 49-50 and accompanying text. (94) On Call Interpreters (n 3) 121 [200]. (95) See, eg, Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16; Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 21 (96) See generally Andrew Stewart et al, Creighton and Stewart's Labour Law (Federation Press, 6......
  • Get Started for Free