Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 4)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date21 December 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 1620
CourtFederal Court
Date21 December 2021

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 4) [2021] FCA 1620

File number:

SAD 38 of 2013



Judgment of:

WHITE J



Date of judgment:

21 December 2021



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – overlapping applications for the determination of native title over Oodnadatta and the surrounding Oodnadatta Common – claimant groups or sub‑groups had determinations of native title over the areas adjacent to the Overlap Area – acceptance that by reason of their acknowledgement and observance of their respective traditional laws and customs, each claimant possesses native title rights and interests in the respective adjacent areas – whether the Arabana had, by reason of their continued acknowledgment and observance of their traditional laws and customs, continued to have native title rights and interests in the Overlap Area – whether the Walka Wani had at effective sovereignty native title rights and interests in the Overlap Area – consideration of distinction between “ownership” and “use rights” – whether s 47A applied to certain allotments in the township so that extinguishment could be disregarded.


Held: Arabana application dismissed and Walka Wani claim granted.



Legislation:

Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AG

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 23B, 47, 47A, 47B, 67, 223, 225, 238, 251D, 253

Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth)

Aboriginal Land Trust Act 1977 (SA)

Associations Incorporation Act 1985 (SA)



Cases cited:

AB (decased) (on behalf of the Ngarla People) v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268

Ah‑Chee v Stuart [2019] FCAFC 165

Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; (2012) 247 CLR 345

Badimia People v Western Australia [2016] FCAFC 67; (2016) 240 FCR 466

Banjima People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 868; (2013) 205 ALR 1

Banjima People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCAFC 84; (2015) 231 FCR 456

Bodney v Bennell [2008] FCAFC 63; (2008) 167 FCR 84

CG (Deceased) on behalf of the Badimia People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 204

Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2015] FCA 9; (2015) 325 ALR 213

De Rose v State of South Australia [2002] FCA 1342

Dodd v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 519

Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v Western Australia [2020] FCAFC 69; (2020) 276 FCR 203

Erubam Le v State of Queensland [2003] FCAFC 227; (2003) 134 FCR 155

Fejo v Northern Territory of Australia [1998] HCA 58; (1998) 195 CLR 96

Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjbarndi People [2019] FCAFC 177; (2019) 273 FCR 350

Gudjala People #2 v Native Title Registrar [2007] FCA 1167

Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298

King on behalf of the Eringa Native Title Claim Group and the Eringa No 2 Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 1387

King on behalf of the Eringa Native Title Claim Group v South Australia [2011] FCA 1386

Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; (2011) 243 CLR 361

Lake Torrens Overlap Proceedings (No 3) [2016] FCA 899

Manado on behalf of the Bindunbur Native Title Claim Group v State of Western Australia [2018] FCAFC 238; (2018) 265 FCR 68

Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v State of Victoria [2002] HCA 58; (2002) 214 CLR 422

Moses v Western Australia [2007] FCAFC 78; (2007) 160 FCR 148

Narrier v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 1519

Northern Territory of Australia v Alyawarr [2005] FCAFC 135; (2005) 145 FCR 442

Pareroultja v Tickner (1993) 42 FCR 32

R v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 69; (1982) 158 CLR 327

Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404

Rrumburriya Borroloola v Northern Territory [2016] FCA 776

Sampi v Western Australia [2005] FCA 777

Starkey on behalf of the Kokatha People v State of South Australia [2018] FCAFC 36; (2018) 261 FCR 183

Stuart v State of South Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 230

Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 2) [2021] FCA 194

Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Overlap Proceeding) [2019] FCA 1282

The Commonwealth of Australia v Yarmirr [2001] HCA 56; (2001) 208 CLR 1

The State of Western Australia v Ward [2002] HCA 28; (2002) 213 CLR 1

Western Australia v Graham (on behalf of the Ngadju People) [2013] FCAFC 143; (2013) 305 ALR 452

Wyman on behalf of the Bidjara People v Queensland [2014] FCA 528

Wyman v Queensland [2015] FCAFC 108; (2015) 235 FCR 464

Yankunytjatjara/Antakarinja Native Title Claim Group v South Australia [2006] FCA 1142

Yanner v Eaton [1999] HCA 53; (1999) 201 CLR 351



Division:

General Division



Registry:

South Australia



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Number of paragraphs:

1053



Date of hearing:

30 September, 1‑3, 8-11, 14-18 and 21-25 October 2019, 19-23 October 2020 and 11 and 12 March 2021



Counsel for the First Applicant:

Mr A Collett with Ms A Sibree



Solicitor for the First Applicant:

Camatta Lempens



Counsel for the Second and Third Applicants:

Ms T Jowett with Mr C Gregory (30 September, and 1-3, 8‑11 and 14‑18 October 2019

Mr V Hughston SC with Ms T Jowett (21‑25 October 2019, 19‑23 October 2020 and 11 and 12 March 2021)



Solicitor for the Second and Third Applicants:

South Australian Native Title Services



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Mr T Golding with Mr W Ambrose (30 September, 1‑3, 8‑11, 14‑18 and 21-25 October 2019 and 19-23 October 2020)

Mr W Ambrose with Mr P Tonkin (11 and 12 March 2021)



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Crown Solicitor’s Office



Counsel for the Respondents:

The remaining Respondents did not appear



Table of Corrections




...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex