Sullivan v Moody
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gaudron,McHugh,Hayne,Callinan JJ |
Judgment Date | 11 October 2001 |
Neutral Citation | [2001] HCA 59,2001-1011 HCA D |
Court | High Court |
Docket Number | A21/2001 |
Date | 11 October 2001 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
276 cases
- Rush v Commissioner of Police
-
Harriton v Stephens
...can be secured from several ‘salient features’ 130 that have been identified as potentially relevant to the existence of a duty. In Sullivan v Moody131 three particular considerations were identified which will often point against the existence of a duty. These were (1) that finding a duty ......
- Dale v Veda Advantage Information Services and Solutions Ltd
-
Hill et al. v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board et al., (2007) 230 O.A.C. 260 (SCC)
...NSWSC 632, refd to. [para. 121]. Gregory v. Gollan, [2006] NZHC 426, refd to. [para. 121]. Sullivan v. Moody (2001), 183 A.L.R. 404; [2001] HCA 59, refd to. [para. Cran v. State of New South Wales (2004), 62 N.S.W.L.R. 95; [2004] NSWCA 92, leave to appeal denied [2005] HCA Trans 21, refd to......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Damages on 'no-transaction' basis
...11[2013] NSWCA 476, per Macfarlan JA at [160] and Beazley P at [1] 12[2013] NSWCA 476, per Macfarlan JA at [179] and Beazley P at [1] 13(2001) 207 CLR 562 at 579-580 14Hunter and New England Local Health District v McKenna; Hunter and New England Local Health District v Simon [2014] HCA 44 ......
-
Vicarious liability litigation duties
...Health NHS Trust [2005] 2 AC 373; [2005] All ER (D) 292 (Apr); [2005] UKHL 23. 7 Sullivan v Moody; Thompson v Connon (2001) 207 CLR 562; 183 ALR 404; [2001] HCA 59; 8 Above n 2, at [29]. 9 Above n 2, at [30]. 10 Above n 2, at [35]. 11 Govier v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust [201......
-
Establishing a right to privacy in Australia: What would it look like and how would it work?
...and investigations into, persons such as Rolf Harris and Jimmy Savile in this context. 7 [317]. 8 [111], [113]. 9 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562. Note that the High Court's position is contrary to the view reached by the UK House of Lords on the same question in Spring v Guardian Assur......
-
No duty of care owed by a health authority to family of murder victim
...a duty of care imposed at common law, to the extent such a duty would be inconsistent with the statute. Footnote 1Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562. © HopgoodGanim Award-winning law firm HopgoodGanim offers commercially-focused advice, coupled with reliable and responsive service, to clie......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 books & journal articles
-
Misfeasance in public office: a very peculiar tort.
...The differences in the approaches of Australian and Canadian courts are not relevant to this discussion. (209) See Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562; D v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust [2005] 2 AC (210) Jain v Trent Strategic Health Authority [2009] 1 AC 853. (211) See Tame v N......
-
Government liability in negligence.
...(although the references following are to the 1972 Act as it applied at the times relevant to the litigation in Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562 (56) Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) s 24. See also Community Welfare Act 1972 (SA) s 91(l)(a). (57) Children a......
-
THE PROMISE OF UNIVERSALITY
...of checks and balances envisioned by the Act, to the detriment of their clients, without the latter having some form of recourse). 194 (2001) 207 CLR 562. 195 (2006) 226 CLR 52. 196 (2003) 212 CLR 511. 197 (2007) 230 CLR 22. 198 (2004) 217 CLR 469. 199255 NY 170 (1931) 200Ultramares Corp v ......
-
The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study
...[108] (Kirby J), 504 [125] (Callinan J); D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1, 37 [102] (McHugh J); Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562, 581 [57] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Hayne and Callinan JJ); Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317, 430 [335] (Callinan J), 335 [26......
Request a trial to view additional results