Sungravure Pty Ltd v Middle East Airlines Airliban Sal

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1975] HCA 8,1975-0226 HCA B,1975-0221 HCA A
Year1975
Date1975

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
210 cases
  • Farah ConstructIons Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 24 May 2007
    ...v Farah Constructions Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 309 at [60]. 60 The documents referred to are described at [15]. 61 See above at [13]. 62 (1975) 132 CLR 373 at 63Smith Kline & French Laboratories (Aust) Ltd v Secretary to Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 22 FCR 73 at 121 per Gu......
  • Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Ong Cheng Aik
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 2 September 2004
    ...be taken. It also does not depend upon detriment to the plaintiff. Gibbs J in Consul Development Pty Limited v DPC Estates Pty Limited (1975) 132 CLR 373 at 394 Where the rule applies, the liability of the person in a fiduciary position does not depend on the fact that the person to whom th......
  • Warman International Ltd v Dwyer
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • The responsibilities of becoming a director
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 17 July 2015
    ...ACSR 562 at 577 per Davies J. 31Permanent Building Society (in liq) v McGee supra. 32 Consul Development Pty Ltd v DPC Estates Pty Ltd (1975) 132 CLR 373 at 398. 33 Permanent Building Society (in liq) v Wheeler (1994) 11 WAR 187 at 161. 34 Permanent Building Society (in liq) v McGee supra a......
  • Product Disparagement: Protecting Your Product's Reputation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 27 October 2008
    ...in injurious falsehood by the manufacturers and distributors of the car (see Sungravure Pty Ltd v Middle East Airlines Airliban SAL (1976) 134 CLR 1 at However, as plaintiffs, the manufacturers and distributors would have to prove falsity, malice and actual damage. Falsity The plaintiff mus......
7 books & journal articles
  • 'The receipt of what?': Questions concerning third party recipient liability in equity and unjust enrichment.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 1, April 2007
    • 1 April 2007
    ...actual, rather than constructive, notice of the plaintiff's interest. (48) See, eg, Consul Development Pty Ltd v DPC Estates Pty Ltd (1975) 132 CLR 373, 412 (Stephen J) ('Consul'); Nicholls, above n 7, 233,235. (49) See, eg, Koorootang [1998] 3 VR 16; Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Thron......
  • THE EFFECTIVE REACH OF CHOICE OF LAW AGREEMENTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...29 See, for example, Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert Smith & Co (No 2)[1969] 2 Ch 276; Consul Development Pty Ltd v DPC Estates Pty Ltd(1975) 132 CLR 373; Belmont Finance Corporation Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd[1979] Ch 250 (CA); Belmont Finance Corporation Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2......
  • Three Decades of Tension: From the Codification of Migration Decision-Making to an Overarching Framework for Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 48-3, September 2020
    • 1 September 2020
    ...again by McHugh J in R v Barlow.86In Mellifont it was even78. Ibid.79. See, eg, Sungravure Pty Ltd v Middle East Airlines Airl iban SAL (1975) 134 CLR 1; Gamer’s Motor Centre(Newcastle) Pty Ltd v Natwest Wholesale Australia Pty Ltd (1987) 163 CLR 236.80. Charlie v R (1999) 199 CLR 387, 410 ......
  • The End of Knowing Receipt
    • Canada
    • Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law No. 2-1, January 2016
    • 1 January 2016
    ...assets. his important diference has been long overlooked in cases involving the 99. Consul Development Pty Ltd v DPC Estates Pty Ltd , [1975] HCA 8 at para 5 [ Consul ]; Novoship (UK) Ltd v Nikitin , [2014] EWCA Civ 908 at para 82; Mysty Clapton, “Gain-Based Remedies for Knowing Assistance:......
  • Get Started for Free