Suvaal v Cessnock City Council

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Heydon J,McHugh,Kirby JJ,Callinan J
Judgment Date06 August 2003
Neutral Citation[2003] HCA 41,2003-0806 HCA B
Docket NumberS384/2002
CourtHigh Court
Date06 August 2003
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 September 2003
    ...Queen (2000) 200 CLR 234 at 257-258 [57]-[58]. 78 Williams v Smith (1960) 103 CLR 539 at 545 noted in Suvaal v Cessnock City Council [2003] HCA 41 at [116] by McHugh J and 79 Joint reasons at [21]-[36]. 80Naxakis v Western General Hospital (1999) 197 CLR 269 at 282-283 [40]-[41], 287-294 ......
  • Dutton v O'shanev
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Kennon v Spry
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 December 2008
    ...to in Owners of ‘Shin Kobe Maru’ v Empire Shipping Co Inc (1994) 181 CLR 404 at 415; [1994] HCA 54; Suvaal v Cessnock City Council (2003) 77 ALJR 1449 at 1467 [105]; 200 ALR 1 at 27; [2003] HCA 41; Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon (2003) 77 ALJR 1598 at 1608 [52]; 200 ALR 447 at 198 Hargreaves v Ha......
  • Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 September 2003
    ...Ltd v Ryan (2002) 77 ALJR 183 at 205 [106], 221-222 [194]-[202]; 194 ALR 337 at 366, 388-391; see also Suvaal v Cessnock City Council [2003] HCA 41 at [71]-[76]; Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon [2003] HCA 48; cf Luntz, ‘Torts Turnaround Downunder’, (2001) 1 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Jour......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...and n oting also SRA (1999) 160 ALR 588, 617–18. The SRA case was also referred to by Kirby J in Suvaal v Cessnock City Council (2003) 200 ALR 1, 19 [73]; Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR 434, 488 [163]. He referred to the Trawl case in Suvaal v Cessnock City Council (2003) 200 ALR 1, 19......
  • THE UNSTABLE PROVINCE OF JURY FACT-FINDING: EVIDENCE EXCLUSION, PROBATIVE VALUE AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT AFTER IMM V. THE QUEEN.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 2, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...to illusions about the value and accuracy of their own judgment': Ipp (n 138) 670. (141) Seen 88. (142) Suvaal v Cessnock City Council (2003) 200 ALR 1, 19 [71] (McHugh and Kirby (143) In CSR, Kirby J said '[i]t would be a misfortune for legal doctrine if, so soon after Fox v Percy correcte......
  • Noticeboard
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 8-2, March 2004
    • 1 March 2004
    ...Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK. E-mail: R.Pattenden@uea.ac.uk Fact-finding constrained by pleadings—Australia In Suvaal v Cessnock City Council [2003] HCA 41 (6 August 2003), the High Court Australia ruled that in a civil negligence action it was not competent for a trial judge to make a determination......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT