Svikart v Stewart
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1994-1207 HCA B,[1994] HCA 62 |
| Date | 1994 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
- C v T
-
New South Wales v Commonwealth
...485Spratt v Hermes (1965) 114 CLR 226 at 242; Capital TV and Appliances Pty Ltd v Falconer (1971) 125 CLR 591 at 611; Svikart v Stewart (1994) 181 CLR 548 at 486 Joint reasons at [329], setting out ss 5(1) and 6(1) of the new Act. 487Pidoto v Victoria (1943) 68 CLR 87 at 108. 488 cf Sportod......
-
North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Ltd v Northern Territory
...Queen (1957) 95 CLR 529; [1957] AC 288. 121 Section 6 of the Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act 1978 (Cth). 122Svikart v Stewart (1994) 181 CLR 548 at 562; [1994] HCA 62, explaining Capital Duplicators Pty Ltd v Australian Capital Territory (1992) 177 CLR 248; [1992] HCA 123 (1997) 19......
- Kruger v Commonwealth; Bray v Commonwealth
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...(1958) 99 CLR 132, 143 (Dixon CJ; Webb, Kitto and Taylor JJ agreeing). 20 Section 125 of the Constitution. But cf Svikart v Stewart (1994) 181 CLR 548, holding that a 'Commonwealth place' could not be located in a territory. 21 (1965) 114 CLR 226, 243, 245–6 (Barwick CJ). 22 Section 75(v) o......
-
The Resolution of Inconsistent State and Territory Legislation
...75 (1958) 99 CLR 132. 76 (1992) 177 CLR 248 ('Capital Duplicators'). 77 (1994) 181 CLR 548. 78 See also Brian R Opeskin, 'Constitutional Dimensions of Choice of Law in Australia' (1992) 3 Public Law Review 152, 185. 408 Federal Law Review Volume 38 __________________________________________......
-
Property and the Drafting of the Australian Constitution
...between_____________________________________________________________________________________74 For example, Svikart v Stewart (1994) 181 CLR 548 on whether s 52(i) applied to propertyacquired by the Commonwealth within a territory.75 (1992) 175 CLR 1.76 (1996) 187 CLR 1.77 Mabo v State of Q......