Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date09 April 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 328
CourtFederal Court
Date09 April 2021

Federal Court of Australia


Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 328

File number(s):

VID 330 of 2019



Judgment of:

O’BRYAN J



Date of judgment:

9 April 2021



Catchwords:

TRADE MARKS – validity – whether “Corner Hotel” and “Corner” marks capable of distinguishing applicant’s services of conducting a live music venue within s 41 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether use of those marks likely to deceive or cause confusion within s 88(2)(c) – infringement – whether respondents infringed applicant’s marks by using the “Jazz Corner Hotel” name and associated names and brands as trade marks in relation to live music services – whether marks have been used as trade marks in relation to live music services – whether marks are deceptively similar to “Corner Hotel” and “Corner” within s 120(1) – whether use in good faith to indicate a characteristic of the services within s 122(1)(b)(i) – whether entitled to obtain registration of marks for the purposes of s 122(1)(fa) – whether use of registered marks is the exercise of rights granted under the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) and thereby satisfies s 122(1)(e) – whether the corporate respondents are joint tortfeasors – whether individual respondent, as director of the corporate respondents, is a joint tortfeasor



Legislation:

Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 7(1), 10, 25, 41, 41(3), 41(4), 44(2), 44(3)(a), 44(3)(b), 44(4), 57, 88(1)(a), 88(2)(a), 88(2)(c), 120(1), 120(2), 122(1)(b)(i), 122(1)(e), 122(1)(fa), 126(1), 126(2)

Trade Marks Amendment Act 2006 (Cth) s 41

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 14.03

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd[2009] FCA 1299; 83 IPR 210;

Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd (2018) 261 FCR 301

Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Ltd v ACPA Pty Ltd (2018) 259 FCR 514

Apple Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks(2014) 227 FCR 511

Australian Meat Group v JBS Australia Pty Ltd(2018) 268 FCR 623

Australian Postal Corporation v Digital Post Australia Pty Ltd (No 2)[2012] FCA 862; 293 ALR 369

Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v FS Walton & Co Ltd(1937) 58 CLR 641

B Stone & Co Ltd v Steelace Manufacturing Co Ltd (1929) 46 RPC 406

Blount Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks(1998) 83 FCR 50

Bohemia Crystal Pty Ltd v Host Corporation Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 235; 129 IPR 482

British Sugar plc v James Robertson & Sons Ltd[1996] RPC 281

Britt Allcroft (Thomas) LLC v Miller (t/as The Thomas Shop)[2000] FCA 699; 49 IPR 7

Burger King Corporation v Registrar of Trade Marks (1973) 128 CLR 417

CA Henschke v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd[2000] FCA 1539; 52 IPR 42

Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Modena Trading Pty Ltd(2014) 254 CLR 337

Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks (1964) 111 CLR 511

Coca-Cola Company v All-Fect Distributors Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 107

Colorado Group Ltd v Strandbags Group Pty Ltd (2007) 164 FCR 506

Crazy Ron’s Communications Pty Ltd v Mobileworld Communications Pty Ltd[2004] FCAFC 196; 209 ALR 1

E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd(2010) 241 CLR 144

Eastman Photographic Materials Company Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (the Solio Case)[1898] AC 571

F.H. Faulding & Co Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries of Australia and New Zealand Ltd (1965) 112 CLR 537

Global Brand Marketing Inc v YD Pty Ltd[2008] FCA 605; 76 IPR 161

Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 5; 64 IPR 495

Health World Limited v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd[2008] FCA 100; 75 IPR 478

In-N-Out Burgers, Inc v Hashtag Burgers Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 193; 377 ALR 116

Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd(1991) 30 FCR 326

JR Consulting & Drafting Pty Ltd v Cummings [2016] FCAFC 20; 329 ALR 625

Keller v LED Technologies Pty Ltd (2010) 185 FCR 449

Mantra Group Pty Ltd v Tailly Pty Ltd (No 2) (2010) 183 FCR 450

Mark Foy’s Ltd v Davies Coop & Co Ltd (1956) 95 CLR 190

McCorqhadale v Masterson[2004] FCA 1247; 63 IPR 582

Mentmore Manufacturing Co Ltd v National Merchandising Manufacturing Co Inc (1978) 89 DLR (3d) 195

MID Sydney Pty Ltd v Australian Tourism Co Ltd(1998) 90 FCR 236

Oxford University Press v Registrar of Trade Marks (1990) 24 FCR 1

Pacific Publications Pty Ltd v IPC Media Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 104 57 IPR 28

Performing Right Society Ltd v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Ltd[1924] 1 KB 1

Re Bali Brassiere Co. Inc’s Registered Trade Mark; Re Berlei Ltd’s Application (1968) 118 CLR 128

Reckitt & Colman (Australia) Ltd v Boden (1945) 70 CLR 84

Registrar of Trade Marks v W & G Du Cros Ltd [1913] AC 624

Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd(1999) 93 FCR 365

Shell Co of Australia Ltd v EssoStandard Oil (Aust) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 407

Southern Cross Refrigerating Co v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd(1954) 91 CLR 592

Starr Partners Pty Ltd v Dev Prem Pty Ltd[2007] FCAFC 42; 71 IPR 459

Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd[2020] FCA 396; 153 IPR 1

Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd[2012] FCA 252

Trident Seafoods Corp v Trident Foods Pty Ltd[2019] FCAFC 100; 369 ALR 367

Unilever Aust Ltd v Karounos(2001) 113 FCR 322

Urban Alley Brewery Pty Ltd v La Sirène Pty Ltd[2020] FCA 82; 150 IPR 11

Wingate Marketing Pty Ltd v Levi Strauss & Co (1994) 49 FCR 89

Woolworths Ltd v BP Plc (No 2) (2006) 154 FCR 97



Date of hearing:

16 – 17 March 2020



Date of last submissions:

3 April 2020



Registry:

Victoria



Division:



National Practice Area:



Sub-area

Trade Marks



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

295



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr E Heerey QC with Mr S Rebikoff



Solicitor for the Applicant:

K&L Gates



Counsel for the Respondents:

Mr C Golvan QC with Ms M Marcus



Solicitor for the Respondents:

Brand Partners Commercial Lawyers




ORDERS


VID 330 of 2019

BETWEEN:

SWANCOM PTY LTD

Applicant


AND:

THE JAZZ CORNER HOTEL PTY LTD ACN 615 168 968 (and others named in the Schedule)

Respondents


order made by:

O’BRYAN J

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Allergan Australia Pty Ltd v Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 7 Septiembre 2021
    ...Refrigerating Co v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd [1954] HCA 82; (1954) 91 CLR 592 Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 328 The Shell Company of Australia Limited v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Limited [1963] HCA 66; (1963) 109 CLR 407 The Coca-Cola Company v All-Fe......
  • Firstmac Limited v Zip Co Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 Mayo 2023
    ...v Intellectual Property Development Corp Pty Ltd (2016) 120 IPR 478; [2016] FCA 820 Swancom Pty Ltd v Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 2) (2021) 157 IPR 498; [2021] FCA 328 Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 252 Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd v Tivo Inc (2012)......
  • Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 13 Septiembre 2022
    ...Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 157  Appeal from: Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 328 and Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 729 File number(s): VID 228 of 2021VID 408 of 2021 Judgment of: YATES,......
  • Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 Junio 2021
    ...Cases cited: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 601 Swancom v The Jazz Corner Hotel (No 2) [2021] FCA 328 Division: General Division Registry: Victoria National Practice Area: Intellectual Property Sub-areaexample, free live music or sporting events sh......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Full Federal Court Dismisses Corner Hotel Appeal
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 Noviembre 2022
    ...Pty Ltd (Swancom) appealed the dismissal of trade mark infringement claims in Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 328 (the Primary Decision), previously reported here. The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd (JCHPL) appealed the decision in Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Cor......