Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty. Ltd

JurisdictionVictoria
Year1981
Date1981
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • Electro Cad Australia Pty Ltd and Others v Mejati Rcs Sdn Bhd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1998
  • Vestergaard Frandsen A/S and Others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 26 June 2009
    ...at 213 (Lord Evershed MR), Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1979] 1 Ch 344 at 360 (Sir Robert Megarry V-C), Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty Ltd [1981] RPC 1 at 19 (Harris J) and 21–22 (Marks J) and Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (“Spycatcher”) [1990]......
  • Force India Formula 1 Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team SDN BHD and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 21 March 2012
    ...Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1979] Ch 344 at 360B (Sir Robert Megarry V-C), Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty Ltd [1981] RPC 1 at 19 (Harris J) and 21–22 (Marks J) and Spycatcher at 286E (Lord Goff of Chieveley), in which it has been expressly stated to apply to clai......
  • Invenpro (M) Sdn Bhd v JCS Automation Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 February 2014
    ...(S) Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 77 (refd) Susan Thomas v Elizabeth Pearce [2000] FSR 718 (refd) Talbot v General Television Corp Pty Ltd [1981] RPC 1 (refd) Technip France SA's Patent [2004] RPC 46 (refd) Terrapin Ltd v Builders' Supply Co (Hayes) Ltd [1967] RPC 375 (refd) Union Carbide Corp v Natu......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • MILKY WAY AND ANDROMEDA: PRIVACY, CONFIDENTIALITY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...produce something that is confidential as a whole. Sometimes, 1+1 = 1+1 and not even 2! 83 Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty Ltd [1981] RPC 1 and Fraser v Thames Television Ltd[1984] QB 44. In Singapore, see also Chiarapurk Jack v Haw Par Brothers International Ltd[1993] 3 SLR 285......
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN SINGAPORE: A GENERAL OVERVIEW1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1992, December 1992
    • 1 December 1992
    ...and Effect on the Law of Confidence,”(1990) 32 Mal. L.R. 1 at pp. 33—40. 183 See Talbot v. General Television Corporation Pty. Ltd. [1981] R.P.C. 1; see also Wheatley v. Bell[1984] F.S.R. 16 where the same principle was adopted in relation to a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. ......