Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty. Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Victoria |
| Date | 1981 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
- Electro Cad Australia Pty Ltd and Others v Mejati Rcs Sdn Bhd and Others
-
Force India Formula 1 Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team SDN BHD and Others
...at 213 (Lord Evershed MR), Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1979] Ch 344 at 360B (Sir Robert Megarry V-C), Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty Ltd [1981] RPC 1 at 19 (Harris J) and 21–22 (Marks J) and Spycatcher at 286E (Lord Goff of Chieveley), in which it has been expres......
-
Vestergaard Frandsen A/S and Others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and Others
...at 213 (Lord Evershed MR), Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1979] 1 Ch 344 at 360 (Sir Robert Megarry V-C), Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty Ltd [1981] RPC 1 at 19 (Harris J) and 21–22 (Marks J) and Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (“Spycatcher”) [1990]......
-
Wade and Another v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd
...creation of its own format by the presence of those derived features in their sub-conscious memory: see for example Talbot v General Television Corporation PTY Limited [1981] RPC 1, per Harris J at 11, a decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria on rather similar 5 The law is less clear ab......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
MILKY WAY AND ANDROMEDA: PRIVACY, CONFIDENTIALITY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
...produce something that is confidential as a whole. Sometimes, 1+1 = 1+1 and not even 2! 83 Talbot v General Television Corporation Pty Ltd [1981] RPC 1 and Fraser v Thames Television Ltd[1984] QB 44. In Singapore, see also Chiarapurk Jack v Haw Par Brothers International Ltd[1993] 3 SLR 285......
-
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN SINGAPORE: A GENERAL OVERVIEW1
...and Effect on the Law of Confidence,”(1990) 32 Mal. L.R. 1 at pp. 33—40. 183 See Talbot v. General Television Corporation Pty. Ltd. [1981] R.P.C. 1; see also Wheatley v. Bell[1984] F.S.R. 16 where the same principle was adopted in relation to a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. ......