Taylor v Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 and Others

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ,Crennan,Bell JJ.,Gageler,Keane JJ
Judgment Date02 April 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] HCA 9
Docket NumberS179/2013
Date02 April 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
128 cases
  • Clubb v Edwards
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 Abril 2019
    ...362 ALR 253 at 276; [2018] HCA 62. 454 (1925) 37 CLR 36 at 93; see also at 127. 455 Compare Taylor v Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 253 CLR 531 at 547 548 [36]–[37]; [2014] HCA 9. 456 R (Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] 1 AC 837 at 883 [30], 894 [59], 901 ......
  • SZTAL(Appellant) v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 Septiembre 2017
    ...of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (2012) 250 CLR 503 at 519 [39]; [2012] HCA 55. 39Taylor v Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 253 CLR 531 at 557 [66]; [2014] HCA 40 Section 15AA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth). 41Thiess v Collector of Customs (2014) 250 CLR 664 at 6......
  • Electro Optic Systems Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 31 Octubre 2014
    ...182 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562 Sydney Water Corporation v Turano (2009) 239 CLR 51 Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537 Taylor v Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 306 ALR 547 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1 Trobridge v Hardy (1955) 94 CLR 147 Vaughan v Webb (1902) 2 SR ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • A PURPOSIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRETING AUSTRALIA'S COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REGIME.
    • Australia
    • 1 Diciembre 2019
    ...(77) Zaburoni (n 67) 504 [66]. (78) SZTAL (n 3) 369 [16]. (79) Ibid 375 [38] (Gageler J), quoting Taylor v Owners--Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 253 CLR 531, 557 [66] (Gageler and Keane (80) Predominantly discussed in the criminal law context: see Williams (n 12) 420-1; Mason (n 72) 123; AP S......
  • Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 48-1, March 2020
    • 1 Marzo 2020
    ...‘Is the High Court Mistakenabout the Aim of Statutory Interpretation?’ (2016) 44(2) Federal Law Review 227. 96. Taylor v The Owners (2014) 253 CLR 531, 548 [38] (French CJ, Crennan and Bell JJ), 556–7 [65] (Gageler and JJ) (‘Taylor’). O’Donnell 83 With this restriction in mind, consider a h......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT