Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Company Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia

Judgment Cited authorities 76 Cited in 59 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGageler J.,French CJ,Hayne,Crennan,Kiefel
Judgment Date13 March 2013
Neutral Citation2013-0313 HCA A,[2013] HCA 5
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS178/2012
Date13 March 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
37 cases
  • Clive Frederick Palmer(Plaintiff) v Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their Capacities as Liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) and Others
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 February 2017
    ...22 [51]; [2004] HCA 49; TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 251 CLR 533 at 553 [27]; [2013] HCA 5. 58 (1954) 90 CLR 353; [1954] HCA 59 (1954) 90 CLR 353 at 367–368. 60 (1954) 90 CLR 353 at 369. 61 (1954) 90 CLR 353 at 369–370. 62 211 US 2......
  • Maloney v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 19 June 2013
    ...Affairs v Respondents S152/2003 (2004) 222 CLR 1 at 24–25 [67] per McHugh J; [2004] HCA 18; TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 87 ALJR 410 at 415 [8] per French CJ and Gageler J; 295 ALR 596 at 599; [2013] HCA 26 (1997) 190 CLR 225 at ......
  • Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru and Another
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 December 2015
    ...Federal Court of Australia(2013) 251 CLR 533 at 555 [32] per French CJ and Gageler J, 573 [104] per Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ; [2013] HCA 5, which refers to the analogous case of registration and enforcement of foreign awards; see also South Australia v. Totani(2010) 242 CLR 1 at 6......
  • Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 February 2018
    ...262. See also TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 251 CLR 533 at 556–557 [36]–[39]; [2013] HCA 5. Cf R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Shaw [1951] 1 KB 711 at 721–722; R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribuna......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
11 firm's commentaries
  • Commercial Arbitration: Guidance from Canadian, US, UK and Australian Appellate Courts
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • 15 July 2013
    ...Hydropower Plant LLP, [2013] UKSC 35; and TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v. Judges of the Federal Court of Australia, [2013] HCA 5.\ //fbapps.jdsupra.com/statist...
  • Commercial Arbitration: Guidance From Canadian, US, UK And Australian Appellate Courts
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 18 July 2013
    ...Hydropower Plant LLP, [2013] UKSC 35; and TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v. Judges of the Federal Court of Australia, [2013] HCA 5. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
  • The arbitration regime in Australia: Five years on
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 May 2015
    ...power without any independent judicial process (TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5). The High Court rejected this argument, unanimously holding that arbitral power is not judicial power, which operates regardless of the parties......
  • International Arbitration Comparative Guide
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 July 2021
    ...any purpose, as from the date of the award (see TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596; [2013] HCA 5 at [23] (French CJ and Gageler J)). However, Section 3(2) of the IAA clarifies that 'enforcement' also includes "recognition......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Dispute resolution
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Trust Co [2005] QB 207 at 234 [37], per Mance LJ; TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v he Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5 at [76]. Compare Yorkshire Water Services Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Construction Northern Ltd (2002) 90 Con LR 86 at 107 [18], where HHJ LLoyd QC he......
  • Pro-Arbitration Policy in the Australian Courts — the End of Eisenwerk?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 41-2, June 2013
    • 1 June 2013
    ...(Cth) v The Queen (1957) 95 CLR 529. Cf TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596. 29 Uganda Telecom Ltd v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd [No 2] (2011) 277 ALR 441, 443 [12] (Foster J). 30 Chief Justice Patrick Keane, 'Judicial Support for......
  • The normativity of the principle of legality.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 37 No. 2, August - August 2013
    • 1 August 2013
    ...and Modern (Cornell University Press, 1940) 141. Cf TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596, 607 [35] (French CJ and Gageler J); Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455, 486 (Deane and Toohey JJ); Justice Gummow, above n 50, 176; ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT