TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Company Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGageler J.,French CJ,Hayne,Crennan,Kiefel
Judgment Date13 March 2013
Neutral Citation2013-0313 HCA A,[2013] HCA 5
Docket NumberS178/2012
Date13 March 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
33 cases
  • Australian Communications and Media Authority v Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 4 March 2015
    ...Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 251 CLR 533 at 553–554 [28] per French CJ and Gageler J; [2013] HCA 5. 48Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Australian Communications and Media Authority (2014) 218 FCR 49Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Australian Communi......
  • Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru and Another
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 December 2015
    ...Federal Court of Australia(2013) 251 CLR 533 at 555 [32] per French CJ and Gageler J, 573 [104] per Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ; [2013] HCA 5, which refers to the analogous case of registration and enforcement of foreign awards; see also South Australia v. Totani(2010) 242 CLR 1 at 6......
  • Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 February 2018
    ...262. See also TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 251 CLR 533 at 556–557 [36]–[39]; [2013] HCA 5. Cf R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Shaw [1951] 1 KB 711 at 721–722; R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribuna......
  • Maloney v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 19 June 2013
    ...Affairs v Respondents S152/2003 (2004) 222 CLR 1 at 24–25 [67] per McHugh J; [2004] HCA 18; TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 87 ALJR 410 at 415 [8] per French CJ and Gageler J; 295 ALR 596 at 599; [2013] HCA 26 (1997) 190 CLR 225 at ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 firm's commentaries
  • Commercial Arbitration: Guidance from Canadian, US, UK and Australian Appellate Courts
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • 15 July 2013
    ...Hydropower Plant LLP, [2013] UKSC 35; and TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v. Judges of the Federal Court of Australia, [2013] HCA 5.\ //fbapps.jdsupra.com/statist...
  • Commercial Arbitration: Guidance From Canadian, US, UK And Australian Appellate Courts
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 18 July 2013
    ...Hydropower Plant LLP, [2013] UKSC 35; and TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v. Judges of the Federal Court of Australia, [2013] HCA 5. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
  • International Arbitration Comparative Guide
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 July 2021
    ...any purpose, as from the date of the award (see TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596; [2013] HCA 5 at [23] (French CJ and Gageler J)). However, Section 3(2) of the IAA clarifies that 'enforcement' also includes "recognition......
  • The arbitration regime in Australia: Five years on
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 May 2015
    ...power without any independent judicial process (TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5). The High Court rejected this argument, unanimously holding that arbitral power is not judicial power, which operates regardless of the parties......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Pro-Arbitration Policy in the Australian Courts — the End of Eisenwerk?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 41-2, June 2013
    • 1 June 2013
    ...(Cth) v The Queen (1957) 95 CLR 529. Cf TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596. 29 Uganda Telecom Ltd v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd [No 2] (2011) 277 ALR 441, 443 [12] (Foster J). 30 Chief Justice Patrick Keane, 'Judicial Support for......
  • The normativity of the principle of legality.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 37 Nbr. 2, August - August 2013
    • 1 August 2013
    ...and Modern (Cornell University Press, 1940) 141. Cf TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596, 607 [35] (French CJ and Gageler J); Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455, 486 (Deane and Toohey JJ); Justice Gummow, above n 50, 176; ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT