TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Company Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ,Gageler J.,Hayne,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ
Judgment Date13 March 2013
Neutral Citation2013-0313 HCA A,[2013] HCA 5
Docket NumberS178/2012
Date13 March 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • Maloney v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 19 June 2013
    ...Affairs v Respondents S152/2003 (2004) 222 CLR 1 at 24–25 [67] per McHugh J; [2004] HCA 18; TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 87 ALJR 410 at 415 [8] per French CJ and Gageler J; 295 ALR 596 at 599; [2013] HCA 26 (1997) 190 CLR 225 at ......
  • Clive Frederick Palmer(Plaintiff) v Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their Capacities as Liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) and Others
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 February 2017
    ...22 [51]; [2004] HCA 49; TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 251 CLR 533 at 553 [27]; [2013] HCA 5. 58 (1954) 90 CLR 353; [1954] HCA 59 (1954) 90 CLR 353 at 367–368. 60 (1954) 90 CLR 353 at 369. 61 (1954) 90 CLR 353 at 369–370. 62 211 US 2......
  • Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 February 2018
    ...262. See also TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 251 CLR 533 at 556–557 [36]–[39]; [2013] HCA 5. Cf R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Shaw [1951] 1 KB 711 at 721–722; R v Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribuna......
  • Australian Communications and Media Authority v Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 4 March 2015
    ...Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 251 CLR 533 at 553–554 [28] per French CJ and Gageler J; [2013] HCA 5. 48Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Australian Communications and Media Authority (2014) 218 FCR 49Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd v Australian Communi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries
  • International Arbitration Comparative Guide
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 July 2021
    ...any purpose, as from the date of the award (see TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596; [2013] HCA 5 at [23] (French CJ and Gageler J)). However, Section 3(2) of the IAA clarifies that 'enforcement' also includes "recogn......
  • The arbitration regime in Australia: Five years on
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 May 2015
    ...power without any independent judicial process (TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5). The High Court rejected this argument, unanimously holding that arbitral power is not judicial power, which operates regardless of the parties......
  • Sense prevails – finally - Federal Court's jurisdiction in international arbitration
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 23 March 2013
    ...- which is so obvious in its outcome - at all. *TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
  • Court delivers landmark judgment for Australian arbitration
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 14 March 2013
    ...morning the High Court of Australia delivered the landmark decision, TCL Air Conditioner v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5, that confirmed the constitutionality of the International Arbitration Act 1974, the legal framework which governs international arbitration i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Pro-Arbitration Policy in the Australian Courts — the End of Eisenwerk?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 41-2, June 2013
    • 1 June 2013
    ...(Cth) v The Queen (1957) 95 CLR 529. Cf TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596. 29 Uganda Telecom Ltd v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd [No 2] (2011) 277 ALR 441, 443 [12] (Foster J). 30 Chief Justice Patrick Keane, 'Judicial Support for......
  • The normativity of the principle of legality.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 37 Nbr. 2, August - August 2013
    • 1 August 2013
    ...and Modern (Cornell University Press, 1940) 141. Cf TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Judges of the Federal Court of Australia (2013) 295 ALR 596, 607 [35] (French CJ and Gageler J); Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455, 486 (Deane and Toohey JJ); Justice Gummow, above n 50, 176; ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT