Tcn Channel Nine v Network Ten

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2001-0220 FCA C,2001-0910 FCA A,2001-0704 FCA F
Date2001
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
4 firm's commentaries
  • AGL Energy Limited v Greenpeace Australia Pacific Limited [2021] FCA 625 8 June 2021
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • November 29, 2021
    ...for the purpose of s.41A. Further to this, some of the eight principles referred to in TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 108 may be considered of general application to the concept of "fair dealing"6 and are apposite to Purpose of parody or satire The fair dealing ex......
  • AGL Energy Limited v Greenpeace Australia Pacific Limited [2021] FCA 625 8 June 2021
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • November 29, 2021
    ...for the purpose of s.41A. Further to this, some of the eight principles referred to in TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 108 may be considered of general application to the concept of "fair dealing"6 and are apposite to Purpose of parody or satire The fair dealing ex......
  • Red Card Or Fair Play? Ambush Marketing Back In The News As FIFA World Cup Kicks Off
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • December 8, 2022
    ...FCA 625. 2. See eg. Pokémon Company International, Inc. v Redbubble Ltd [2017] FCA 1541; TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 108 (The Panel Case); TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC The content of this article is intended to provide a general g......
  • No Laughing Matter: Parody Songs And Australian Copyright Law
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • June 2, 2020
    ...helpful judicial guidance actually comes from a case which predates the statutory defence, TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Network 10 Pty Ltd (2001) 108 FCR 235, which concerned the re-broadcast of clips on the television show The Panel. In that context, it was held, based on the Macquarie Dictiona......
3 books & journal articles
  • THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF FAIR DEALING
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...was to a large extent overlooked at both first instance and on appeal to the Full Federal Court” in TCN Channel Nine v Network Ten[2001] FCA 108 and TCN Channel Nine v Network Ten(2002) 118 FCR 417 respectively); and Peter Brudenall, “Fair Dealing in Australian Copyright Law: Rights of Acce......
  • 'A real pea souper': the Panel Case and the development of the fair dealing defences to copyright infringement in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 27 No. 2, August 2003
    • August 1, 2003
    ...BSB'). (34) [1994] EMLR 1 ('Time Warner'). (35) [1999] 1 WLR 605 ('Pro Sieben'). (36) [2001] Ch 143 ('Hyde Park'). (37) The Panel Trial(2001) 108 FCR235, (38) The first clause of this principle is derived from Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84, 94 (Lord Denning MR). The requirement that fair ......
  • Exclusive Rights in News and the Application of Fair Dealing
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • August 16, 2019
    ...supra note 38 para 142. On this point Bennett J relied on the decision in theAustralian case TCN Channel Nine v Network Ten (2001) 108 FCR 235.57Hubbard supra note 35 at 94.(2014) 26 SA MERC LJ600© Juta and Company (Pty) (v) Additional factorsThe subjective intentions of the user are freque......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT