TechnologyOne Limited v Roohizadegan
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 05 August 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCAFC 137 |
| Date | 05 August 2021 |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers' Union of Australia
...reasons asserted by an applicant were a substantial and operative reason for the action; ibid at [113]; TechnologyOne Ltd v Roohizadegan [2021] FCAFC 137 at [105]‑[106]; (h) even if the reasons advanced by a respondent as the actual reasons for the decision are accepted, the absence of evid......
-
Campaigntrack Pty Ltd v Real Estate Tool Box Pty Ltd
...not draw the correct inference that was open, despite his Honour’s credit findings: TechnologyOne Ltd v Roohizadegan [2021] 309 IR 262; [2021] FCAFC 137 at [107]-[113] Rangiah, White and O’Callaghan 323 In this case, the primary judge did not proceed by weighing his general findings of cred......
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Limited
...v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Sun Alliance Insurance Ltd v Massoud [1989] VR 8 TechnologyOne Limited v Roohizadegan [2021] FCAFC 137 The Juliana (1822) 2 Dods 504 at 522; 165 ER 1560 Unique International College Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (201......
-
Alam v National Australia Bank Limited
...Commission [1986] HCA 54; (1986) 161 CLR 141 Tattsbet Ltd v Morrow [2015] FCAFC 63; (2015) 233 FCR 46 TechnologyOne Ltd v Roohizadegan [2021] FCAFC 137 Whelan v Cigarette & Gift Warehouse Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1534; (2017) 275 IR 285 Wong v National Australia Bank Limited [2021] FCA 671 Zhang ......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Employment Law and Workplace Relations Monthly Update ' In the media, In practice and courts, Cases and Legislation
...12.2, 13.2, 13.4, 17, 18, 25.5(a)(ii), 25.5(b)(ii), 25.5(c), 26.1(a), 26.1(b), 28.3, 30.3, 30.4. TechnologyOne Limited v Roohizadegan [2021] FCAFC 137 INDUSTRIAL LAW - adverse action - where primary judge found that respondent was dismissed in contravention of section 340(1) of the Fair Wor......
-
Employment Law and Workplace Relations Monthly Update ' In the media, In practice and courts, Cases and Legislation
...12.2, 13.2, 13.4, 17, 18, 25.5(a)(ii), 25.5(b)(ii), 25.5(c), 26.1(a), 26.1(b), 28.3, 30.3, 30.4. TechnologyOne Limited v Roohizadegan [2021] FCAFC 137 INDUSTRIAL LAW - adverse action - where primary judge found that respondent was dismissed in contravention of section 340(1) of the Fair Wor......