The Defence of Duress Under the Criminal Code (WA)
| Author | Michael Buss |
| Position | President, Court of Appeal of Western Australia |
| Pages | 172-195 |
172
THE DEFENCE OF DURESS UNDER
THE CRIMINAL CODE (WA)
MICHAEL BUSS1*
This article examines the historical origins and development of the codied criminal law of duress
in Western Australia with particular emphasis on the proper construction and application of s 32
of the Criminal Code (WA) as enacted by the Criminal Law Amendment (Homicide) Act 2008
(WA).
The Criminal Code Act 1902 (WA) (the 1902 Act) established a Code of Criminal
Law. Section 2 of the 1902 Act provided that on and from 1 May 1902 the
provisions contained in the Code set forth in the First Schedule to the 1902 Act
shall be the law of Western Australia ‘with respect to the several matters therein
dealt with’. The Code adopted substantially Sir Samuel Grifth’s draft Criminal
Code, which had been enacted in Queensland by the Criminal Code Act 1899
(Qld) (the Queensland Code).
By s 2 of the Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913 (WA) (the 1913
Compilation Act), the 1902 Act as amended was repealed, and the compiled Act
set forth in Appendix B to the 1913 Compilation Act was enacted under the title
of the Criminal Code Act 1913 (the WA Code).
I SIR SAMUEL GRIFFITH’S LETTER DATED
29 OCTOBER 1897
Sir Samuel Grifth sent his draft Criminal Code to the Attorney-General of
Queensland with a letter dated 29 October 1897.
In the letter Sir Samuel Grifth noted:
a) The pages of the draft were arranged in two columns, the proposed
provisions of the Code being printed in the right-hand column, and the
sources from which they were derived, or other analogous provisions,
being stated or referred to in the left-hand column.
b) Where the source was statute law, the corresponding provisions of the
statute were reprinted from Sir Samuel’s Digest of the Statutory Criminal
Law of Queensland of 1896.
c) In other cases, the sources or analogous provisions were indicated by
a reference to the section of the draft Bill introduced into the House of
Commons in 1880 (the 1880 Draft Bill), which was based on a Draft
Code of Criminal Law of 1879 prepared by Lord Blackburn, Justice
* President, Court of Appeal of Western Australia.
173
Barry (of Ireland), Justice Lush and Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, or
other authority to which Sir Samuel had had recourse, with such notes as
appeared to be desirable to elucidate any particular provision.
d) When the proposed provision was ‘undoubted Common Law’,
Sir Samuel had not thought it necessary to do more than say so.
II SECTION 31 OF THE WA CODE AS ENACTED BY THE
1902 ACT AND THE 1913 COMPILATION ACT
Section 31 of the WA Code, as enacted by the 1902 Act and the 1913
Compilation Act, provided, relevantly:
A person is not criminally responsible for an act or omission if he does
or omits to do the act under any of the following circumstances, that is
to say: -
(1) …
(2) …
(3) When the act is reasonably necessary in order to resist
actual and unlawful violence threatened to him, or to
another person in his presence;
(4) When he does or omits to do the act in order to save himself
from immediate death or grievous bodily harm threatened
to be inicted upon him by some person actually present
and in a position to execute the threats, and believing
himself to be unable otherwise to escape the carrying of
the threats into execution;
But this protection does not extend to an act or omission
which would constitute an offence punishable with death,
or an offence of which grievous bodily harm to the
person of another, or an intention to cause such harm, is
an element, nor to a person who has, by entering into an
unlawful association or conspiracy, rendered himself liable
to have such threats made to him.
…
Those provisions were identical to s 31(3) and s 31(4) of the Queensland Code,
as enacted in 1899.
Sir Samuel Grifth’s notes in his draft Criminal Code stated, in relation to the
proposed provision subsequently incorporated in s 31(3) of the WA Code:
Common Law.
Compare Bill of 1880 s.56.
Compare German Civil Code of 1896, s.221 [sic: s 227].
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations