The Environmental Group Ltd v Bowd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeSTEWARD J
Judgment Date21 June 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 951
CourtFederal Court
Date21 June 2019
The Environmental Group Ltd v Bowd <a href="https://au.vlex.com/vid/dzx17-v-minister-for-880795581">[2019] FCA 95</a>

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


The Environmental Group Ltd v Bowd [2019] FCA 951


File numbers:


VID 497 of 2017VID 580 of 2017



Judge:

STEWARD J



Date of judgment:

21 June 2019



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – termination of employment – where employee reported in a CEO report financial irregularities to the board – where employee made a complaint to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission alleging serious fraud within the company before completion of an audit – where employee took personal leave – where employee’s lawyers prepared a letter to the company recording grievances – whether employee exercised a workplace right – whether a “complaint” for the purposes of s 341(1)(c)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) must be made in good faith – whether a complaint “in relation to” an employee’s employment must be directed at or concerned with that person’s employment in a substantive way – whether Pt 9.4AAA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is a “workplace law” – whether adverse action was taken – whether an investigation into an employee’s conduct constituted adverse action – where employee’s dismissal was purportedly a product of the breakdown of the relationship between the board and employee – whether adverse action was taken “because” of the exercise of a workplace right


CORPORATIONS – protection for whistleblowers – whether employee had reasonable grounds to suspect contraventions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether disclosure was made in good faith – whether complaint was made for a secondary purpose


CONTRACTS – breach of contract – whether employee breached contract by retaining company property after termination


COPYRIGHT – acts not constituting copyright infringement – whether copying was done for the purposes of a judicial proceeding – whether the possibility of a future proceeding is sufficient for the purposes of s 43 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)


Legislation:

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 43

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 182, 183, 292-323DA, 251A, 606, 611, 1317AA, 1317AB, 1317AC, 1317AD

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 135

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 12, 97, 340, 341, 342, 352, 360, 361

Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth)

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 155

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (Cth) regs 51, 219

Explanatory Memorandum, Corporate Law Economic Reform Program (Audit and Corporate Disclosure) Bill 2003 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Alicia Hosiery Ltd v Brown Shipley & Co Ltd [1970] 1 QB 195

Auimatagi v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2018] FCAFC 191

Australian Licenced Aircraft Engineers Association v Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Ltd (2012) 208 FCR 386

Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Visy Packaging Pty Ltd (No 3) (2013) 216 FCR 70

Barkhazen v Conair Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 6520

Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay (2012) 248 CLR 500

Bropho v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (2004) 135 FCR 105

Cigarette & Gift Warehouse Pty Ltd v Whelan [2019] FCAFC 16

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (2014) 253 CLR 243

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v De Martin & Gasparini Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 1046

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Endeavour Coal Pty Ltd (2015) 231 FCR 150

Commissioner of Taxation v Scully (2000) 201 CLR 148

Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2001) 107 FCR 93

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 355

General and Finance Facilities Ltd v Cooks Cars (Romford) Ltd [1963] 2 All ER 314

George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104

Healing (Sales) Pty Ltd v Inglis Electrix Pty Ltd (1968) 121 CLR 584

Hill v Compass Ten Pty Ltd (2012) 205 FCR 94

Isles v Daily Mail Newspaper Ltd (1912) 14 CLR 193

Jones v Dowle (1841) 9 M & W 19

Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298

Jones v Queensland Tertiary Admissions Centre Ltd (No 2) (2010) 186 FCR 22

Kordan Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 1807; (2000) 46 ATR 191

Leica Geosystems Pty Ltd v Koudstaal (No 3) [2014] FCA 1129; (2014) 245 IR 422

Milardovic v Vemco Services Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2016] FCA 19

Morley v Monza Imports Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCCA 622

Murrihy v Betezy.com.au Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 908; (2013) 238 IR 307

MZABV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 105

Ogawa v Spender (2006) 151 FCR 228

Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1

Police Federation of Australia v Nixon (2008) 168 FCR 340

Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1982) 57 FLR 368

Shea v EnergyAustralia Services Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 167; (2014) 242 IR 159

Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) [2014] FCA 271; (2014) 242 IR 1

Strand Electric and Engineering Co Ltd v Brisford Entertainments Ltd [1952] 2 QB 246

Tattsbet Ltd v Morrow (2015) 233 FCR 46

Technical Products Pty Ltd v State Government Insurance Office (1989) 167 CLR 45

Walsh v Greater Metropolitan Cemeteries Trust (No 2) [2014] FCA 456; (2014) 243 IR 468



Date of hearing:

22-26 October 2018, 6 February 2019



Registry:

Victoria



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

197



Counsel for the Applicants in VID497/2017 and the Respondents in VID580/2017:

Mr D Christie with Mr B Avallone



Solicitor for the Applicants in VID497/2017 and the Respondents in VID580/2017:

Baker Jones



Counsel for the Respondent in VID497/2017 and the Applicant in VID580/2017:

Mr R A Millar



Solicitor for the Respondent in VID497/2017 and the Applicant in VID580/2017:

McDonald Murholme



ORDERS


VID 497 of 2017

BETWEEN:

THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP LTD (ACN 000 013 427)

First Applicant


BALTEC IES PTY LTD (ACN 124 484 108)

Second Applicant


TOTAL AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PTY LTD (ACN 097 531 416)

Third Applicant


AND:

PETER JOHN BOWD

Respondent



AND


VID 580 of 2017

BETWEEN:

PETER BOWD

Applicant


AND:

THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP LTD (ACN 000 013 427)

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 cases
  • PIA Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v King
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 24 February 2020
    ...Services Pty Ltd (No 6) (2014) 314 ALR 346; [2014] FCA 271 Tak Fat Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 The Environmental Group Ltd v Bowd [2019] FCA 951 Veeraragoo v Goldbreak Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 1448 Walsh v Greater Metropolitan Cemeteries Trust (No 2) (2014) 243 IR 468 Whel......
  • Messenger v Commonwealth of Australia (Represented by the Department of Finance)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 June 2022
    ...v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) (2014) 314 ALR 346 Tattsbet Ltd v Morrow (2015) 233 FCR 46 The Environment Group Pty Ltd v Bowd (2019) 137 ACSR 352 Universe Tankships Inc of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation [1983] 1 AC 366 Wong v National Australia Bank & Anor [2021......
  • Cummins South Pacific Pty Ltd v Keenan
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 24 November 2020
    ...and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362 Taylor v The Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 253 CLR 531 The Environmental Group Ltd v Bowd [2019] FCA 951 Thiess v Collector of Customs (2014) 250 CLR 664 Union Steamship Co of Australia Pty Ltd v King (1988) 166 CLR 1 Walsh v Greater Metropoli......
  • Wong v National Australia Bank Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 22 June 2021
    ...Salama v Sydney Trains [2021] FCA 251 Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) (2014) 314 ALR 346 The Environment Group Pty Ltd v Bowd (2019) 137 ACSR 352 Wood v City of Melbourne Corporation (1979) 26 ALR 430 Division: Fair Work Division Registry: Victoria National Practice Area: Employmen......
  • Get Started for Free