The Grain Pool of Wa v Commonwealth
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Judge | Gaudron,Gleeson CJ,McHugh,Gummow,Hayne,Callinan JJ |
| Judgment Date | 23 March 2000 |
| Neutral Citation | 2000-0323 HCA E,[2000] HCA 14 |
| Docket Number | P34/1998 |
| Date | 23 March 2000 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
63 cases
- Inverness Medical Switzerland Gmbh v Mds Diagnostics Pty Ltd
- Saas v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
-
Inter Lotto (UK) Ltd v Camelot Group Plc
...USA) v General Electric Co Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 729; [1972] 2 All ER 507, HL(E) Grain Pool of Western Australia v Commonwealth of Australia [2000] HCA 14, High Court of Lyle v Kinahan's Application, In re (1907) 24 RPC 249, CA Pontiac Marina Pte Ltd v CDL Hotels International Ltd [1988] FSR 839......
-
ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth
...Leask v The Commonwealth (1996) 187 CLR 579 at 601–602, 621, 633–634; [1996] HCA 29; Grain Pool of Western Australia v The Commonwealth (2000) 202 CLR 479 at 492 [16]; [2000] HCA 175Fairfax v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1965) 114 CLR 1 at 7; [1965] HCA 64; Kartinyeri v The Commonwealt......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Intellectual Property (IP) Rights for plants in Australia
...there is "no intrinsic impediment to the patentability of plant varieties" (Grain Pool of Western Australia v Commonwealth of Australia (2000) 202 CLR 479). Plants are also eligible for patent protection in the US, although this may change following a recent decision by the US Supreme Court......
-
Protecting Plant Innovations
...then the sexually reproduced plants can still be found to infringe a plant patent. [3] Grain Pool of WA v Commonwealth of Australia [2000] HCA 14, Margaux NairMichael Christie, Ph.D....
15 books & journal articles
-
Can Parliament Confer Plenary Executive Power? the Limitations Imposed by Sections 51 and 52 of the Australian Consitution
...272, 294, 213, 251, 373; Re Dingjan; Ex parte Wagner (1995) 183 CLR 323, 369 (McHugh J); Grain Pool of Western Australia v Commonwealth (2000) 202 CLR 479, 492 (where it was said that this principle was ‘well-settled’). 77 Fisher v Fisher (1986) 1 61 CLR 438. Cf R v Lambert; Ex parte Plumme......
-
The (limited) significance of the individual in section 117 state residence discrimination.
...Prescient? (1997). (129) See, eg, Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511, 600; Grain Pool of Western Australia v Commonwealth (2000) 202 CLR 479, 522-5; Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82, 132-3; Kirby, above n (130) See, eg, Pierce, above n 6. (131) This is ......
-
Heresy as Orthodoxy: Were the Founders Progressivists?
...Craven, above n 2, 16–17.14 See, eg, R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams (1935) 54 CLR 262; Grain Pool of Western Australia vCommonwealth (2000) 202 CLR 479; and see, generally, Leslie Zines, The High Court and theConstitution (4th ed, 1997) 17–22.15 (1971) 122 CLR 353.16 Ibid 396.17 Cf Geoffrey......
-
The Interpretation of Legal Terms Used in the Definition of Commonwealth Powers
...CLR 134 ('Nintendo Case') and upheld its power to do so with respect to the second in Grain Pool of Western Australia v Commonwealth (2000) 202 CLR 479 ('Grain Pool'). 240 Federal Law Review Volume 35 ____________________________________________________________________________________ This ......
Request a trial to view additional results