The Jewellery Group Pty Ltd v ACCC

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[2013] FCAFC 144,2013-1129 FCA B
Date2013
Year2013
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 firm's commentaries
  • Renewed focus on dual-price advertising and false or misleading representations
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 14 December 2013
    ...Jewellery Group Pty Ltd (Zamel's) v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2013] FCAFC 144 The Federal Court's decision against Zamel's reinforces that business must take caution when utilising a dual-price advertising strategy, or risk being subject to significant In particular,......
  • Was $49.95, now is misleading: the perils of 'was/now' pricing
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 28 December 2016
    ...price may be used as the "was" price: the ticketed price or the sale price? This issue was considered in Jewellery Group Pty Ltd v ACCC [2013] FCAFC 144. Jewellery Group Pty Ltd operated the Zamel's jewellery business, which released catalogues advertising "was/now" pricing for 44 items. Th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT