The Perennial Question - the burden of proof under article III, rule 2 of the Hague rules: Volcafe Ltd v Cia Sud Americana de Vapores SA [2019] AC 358

AuthorJoshua McKersey
PositionBBusMan, LLB (Hons) (University of Queensland), Student Editor of the Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal, and Research Clerk, MinterEllison. All views expressed in this work are my own, as are all errors
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT