The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | French CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ.,Heydon J. |
| Judgment Date | 14 September 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | 2012-0914 HCA B,[2012] HCA 36 |
| Docket Number | Matter No M155/2011 Matter No M45/2011 Matter No M46/2011 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 14 September 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Clarence City Council v Commonwealth of Australia
...Ltd (1998) 87 FCR 517 at 518 per Black CJ, Wilcox and Goldberg JJ; Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36; 246 CLR 379 at [71] per French, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ; Essendon Airport at [16] and Miller RV, Miller’s Australian Competit......
-
Acting Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v CWY20
...[1974] ICJ Rep 253 Ozer v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 104 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36; (2012) 246 CLR 379 Plaintiff M68/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] HCA 1; (2016) 257 CLR 42 Plaintiff S156/2013 v Min......
-
Plaintiff M76/2013 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship
...s 65(1)(b). 65 See, for example, The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal (2012) 246 CLR 379 at 400–401 [42]; [2012] HCA 36. 66 (1947) 74 CLR 492 at 505 per Dixon J; [1947] HCA 21. 67 (1947) 74 CLR 492 at 505. 68 (1937) 56 CLR 746 at 758; [1937] HCA 15. 69 (2010)......
-
King Eeducational Service Pty Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Skills Quality Authority (No 3)
...and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228; 123 FCR 298 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36; 246 CLR 379 Pileggi v Australian Sports Drug Agency [2004] FCA 955; 138 FCR 107 Raffles College Pty Ltd v Tertiary Education Quality Standar......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
The Harper Review offers conditional support for access regime but with a new regulator
...3 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd and Anor v Australian Competition Tribunal and Ors (M155/2011, M156/2011 and M157/2011) [2012] HCA 36 4 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd and Anor v Australian Competition Tribunal and Ors (M155/2011, M156/2011 and M157/2011) [2012] HCA 36 5 The content of this......
-
Sharing is caring: Third party access to infrastructure clarified by High Court
...develop an alternative facility. The High Court's recent decision in The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36 has clarified the rules and the processes governing third party access to essential This was the latest decision in Fortescue's eight year ......
-
Is the access regime worth keeping? The Productivity Commission says 'yes
...end of this year. Footnotes 1The Final Report can be found here. 2The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36. 3The Hon Bruce Billson MP, "Productivity Commission's final report on National Access Regime released", dated 11 February 2014, available The......
-
The test for declaration of Australian infrastructure under third party access legislation is dead - long live the new test!
...mechanism in the National Access Regime in 2012 in Fortescue (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] HCA 36 (14 September Variants of the declaration mechanism, using very similar criteria, are used in a number of State based access regimes (and the Nati......
Request a trial to view additional results