The Queen(Appellant) v Kritsingh Dookheea
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Judge | Bell,Kiefel CJ,Gageler,Keane,Nettle |
| Judgment Date | 13 September 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] HCA 36 |
| Docket Number | M159/2016 |
| Date | 13 September 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
McKay v Bryant and Rhodes v Bryant
...R v Russell [1933] VLR 59, R v Vinh Ngoc Phan [2001] NSWCCA 29; 123 A Crim R 30, R v Winner (1995) 79 A Crim R 528, The Queen v Dookheea [2017] HCA 36, referred to Chidiac v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 432 , Hart v The Queen [2000] WASCA 103, R v Gibb and McKenzie [1983] 2 VR 155; 7 A Crim R 3......
-
Morluk v Firth
...CJ, Deane, Dawson and Toohey JJ. 27 BCM v The Queen [2013] HCA 48 ; 303 ALR 387. 28 R v M, WJ [2004] SASC 345 . 29The Queen v Dookheea [2017] HCA 36; 347 ALR 529 at 30The Queen v Dookheea (2017) 347 ALR 529 at [34]–[36]. 31Warford v Firth [2017] NTSC 75 at [61]. 32 Transcript of Proceedings......
-
H (CA741/2017) v R
...of probabilities by the direction that it is not enough to find the defendant probably guilty or even very likely guilty. 11 R v Dookheea [2017] HCA 36, 347 ALR 529 at The Judge’s response to the jury’s question [23] Mr Rogers next submitted that the Judge erred in the answer he provided to......