The Queen(Appellant) v Kritsingh Dookheea

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeBell,Kiefel CJ,Gageler,Keane,Nettle
Judgment Date13 September 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] HCA 36
Docket NumberM159/2016
CourtHigh Court
Date13 September 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • McKay v Bryant and Rhodes v Bryant
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 8 Diciembre 2017
    ...R v Russell [1933] VLR 59, R v Vinh Ngoc Phan [2001] NSWCCA 29; 123 A Crim R 30, R v Winner (1995) 79 A Crim R 528, The Queen v Dookheea [2017] HCA 36, referred to Chidiac v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 432 , Hart v The Queen [2000] WASCA 103, R v Gibb and McKenzie [1983] 2 VR 155; 7 A Crim R 3......
  • Morluk v Firth
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 2017
    ...CJ, Deane, Dawson and Toohey JJ. 27 BCM v The Queen [2013] HCA 48 ; 303 ALR 387. 28 R v M, WJ [2004] SASC 345 . 29The Queen v Dookheea [2017] HCA 36; 347 ALR 529 at 30The Queen v Dookheea (2017) 347 ALR 529 at [34]–[36]. 31Warford v Firth [2017] NTSC 75 at [61]. 32 Transcript of Proceedings......
  • H (CA741/2017) v R
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 26 Junio 2018
    ...of probabilities by the direction that it is not enough to find the defendant probably guilty or even very likely guilty. 11 R v Dookheea [2017] HCA 36, 347 ALR 529 at The Judge’s response to the jury’s question [23] Mr Rogers next submitted that the Judge erred in the answer he provided to......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT