The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeKiefel CJ,Keane J.,Bell,Gageler JJ.,Edelman J.
Judgment Date16 October 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] HCA 35
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS43/2019, S44/2019 & S45/2019
Date16 October 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 firm's commentaries
  • Victorian Government Bulletin - In the media, Practice and courts, Cases and Legislation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 June 2020
    ...2014 (Vic) - appellant's construction gives no practical effect to s 39 - proceeding commenced within time - appeal dismissed - R v A2 [2019] HCA 35; (2019) 93 ALJR 1106; Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Statute Update (Regulations References) Bill......
  • Inside Track: Property & Real Estate - In the media, In practice and courts, Cases and Legislation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 29 May 2020
    ...2014 (Vic) - appellant's construction gives no practical effect to s 39 - proceeding commenced within time - appeal dismissed - R v A2 [2019] HCA 35; (2019) 93 ALJR 1106; Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Annat v Commissioner of State Revenue [2020]......
  • FGM statutory interpretation: High Court outcome
    • Australia
    • LexBlog Australia
    • 16 October 2019
    ...45 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), concerning female genital mutilation. See The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri [2019] HCA 35, available on AUSTLII. NSW CCA The NSW CCA had previously allowed appeals against convictions on the ground that the trial judge had erred in his......
  • FGM conviction revisited in NSWCA
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 7 February 2020
    ...conviction in these matters, following an earlier appeal to the High Court (The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri [2019] HCA 35) which allowed the appeal and remitted matter for determination of unreasonable verdict ground on proper construction of s 45(1)(a) of Crimes Ac......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT