The Queen v Edwards
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Hayne,Heydon,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ |
| Judgment Date | 21 May 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] HCA 20,2009-0521 HCA A |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | H4/2008 |
| Date | 21 May 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
-
Jason Wall v DPP
...v Commissioner for the Metropolis [2002] 2 AC 692; R v Glen [2003] NIJB 99; R v Mc Nally and Mc Manus (2009) NICA 3; The Queen v Edwards [2009] HCA 20; US v Robinson 414 US 218 (1973) and Weeks v US 232 US 383 (1914) considered - Non-Fatal Offences against the Person Act 1997 (No 26), s 13 ......
-
GLJ v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Lismore
...1 All ER 649 at 666 [41]. 87 Moubarak by his tutor Coorey v Holt (2019) 100 NSWLR 218 at 238 [89]-[90]. 88 (2009) 83 ALJR 717 at 722 [31]; 255 ALR 399 at 89 R v McCarthy (unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, 12 August 1994) at 11-12, 14. 90 (2000) 49......
-
Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 13)
...J), their Honours referring to a passage in the judgment of Wilson J in Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75, 111. 24 R v Edwards (2009) 255 ALR 399, 406 [33]; (2009) 83 ALJR 717, 723; and see the authorities there 25 R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592, 605–6 (Mason CJ, Toohey J); Walton v Gard......
-
David Harold Eastman v DPP
...Smith (1996) 86 A Crim R 308 applied R v Celep [1998] 4 VR 811 referred to R v Doyle (2001) 123 A Crim R 151 referred to R v Edwards (2009) 255 ALR 399 applied R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592 applied R v Hamilton (1930) 30 SR (NSW) 277 referred to R v Taufahema (2007) 228 CLR 232 applied R v......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Abuse: Stay of proceedings in claim against executor.
...these matters may lead to a finding that a fair trial may be possible, even though the trial may not be perfect: see The Queen v Edwards [2009] HCA 20. There may be many other ways in which a fair trial can be had. However, in this case, for all of the foregoing reasons, I am persuaded that......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...2394 . . . . . . . . . . 90R vDowlan (1997) 92A Crim R305 . . . . . . . . . 308R vDuncan (1981) 73Cr App R359 . . . . . 141, 142R vEdwards [2009] HCA20 . . . . . . . . . . . . 358–359R vEllard 2009 SCC27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342,346R vEmery (1993) 14Cr App R(S) 394 . . . . . . . ......
-
Case Commentaries
...grounds that courts have acknowledged could justify a stay.Both grounds were put forward as reasons to stay the prosecution in RvEdwards[2009] HCA 20, an appeal to the High Court of Australia by the Crown against thedecision of the judge at first instance to stay the prosecution of two pilo......