The Queen v Harold Scott Upton
Jurisdiction | Australian Capital Territory |
Judge | Connolly J |
Judgment Date | 01 July 2005 |
Court | Supreme Court of ACT |
Docket Number | No SCC 159 of 2002 |
Date | 01 July 2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Re Belden Namah
...ACT SC 102 R v Delly [2003] ACTSC 113 R v Forsyth [2013] ACTSC 179 R v Griffin [2006] ACTSC 77 R v Griffin [2007] ACTCA 6 R v Upton [2005] ACTSC 52 S & B Pty Ltd v Podobnik (1994) 53 FCR 180 Counsel: Mr. P. Kaluwin with Mr. F. Popeu, Counsel Assisting the Tribunal Mr. G. Sheppard with Mr. G......
-
R v GZ
...[1999] 1 NZLR 347 R v Robillard (1986) 18 CCC (3d) 22 R v Speid (1983) 430 OR (2d) 596 R v Tremblay (1987) 37 CCC (3d) 565 R v Upton [2005] ACTSC 52 R v Wilding (2007) 229 CCC (3d) 507 R v Williams (2007) 16 VR 168 Sali v SPC Ltd (1993) 116 ALR 625 Spiers (Procurator Fiscal) v Ruddy [20......
-
Kara Lesley Mills v The Queen
...Ms M Jones Attorney-General's Reference (No 2 of 2001) [2004] 2 AC 72 Spiers (Procurator Fiscal) v Ruddy [2008] 1 AC 873 R v Upton [2005] ACTSC 52 Jago v The District Court of New South Wales (1989) 168 CLR 23 Emanuele v Dau (1995) 78 A Crim R 242 R v Bui [2011] ACTSC 102 R v PJ [2008] ACTS......
-
Dennis Michael Nona v The Queen [ACTCA]
...SCR 771 R v Nona [2012] ACTSC 41 R v Shepherd (1990) 170 CLR 513 R v The Coroner at Mackay ; ex parte Butler [1990] 1 QdR 451 R v Upton [2005] ACTSC 52 R v Williams [2009] 2 NZLR 750 The Constitution Act 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), c 11 s 11 European Convention for the Pro......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
...trial; In the Matter of an Application for the Adoption of TL [2005] ACTSC 49 (Unreported, Connolly J, 1 July 2005) [14] and R v Upton [2005] ACTSC 52 (Unreported, Connolly J, 1 July 2005) [10], [16]–[18], which held that judges must consider the HRA in exercising discretion conferred by st......