The Queen v Tang
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Judge | Gummow J,Kirby J,Hayne J,Heydon J,Crennan J,Kiefel J |
| Judgment Date | 28 August 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | 2008-0828 HCA B,[2008] HCA 39 |
| Docket Number | M5/2008 |
| Date | 28 August 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
R v Tang
...HCA 39)" class="content__heading content__heading--depth1"> ([2008] HCA 39) Australia, High Court (Gleeson CJ; Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan and Kiefel JJ) R and International criminal law — Offences against humanity — International Convention to Suppress the Slave Trade and Slavery......
- Li v Chief of Army
-
The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri
...(2019) 93 ALJR 405 at 408 [13]; 364 ALR 383 at 386. 83 [2001] 1 SCR 45 at 77 [38], 79 [43]. 84 (2011) 32 VR 361. 85 (2008) 237 CLR 1; [2008] HCA 39. 86 R v Wei Tang (2008) 237 CLR 1 at 16 87 R v Wei Tang (2008) 237 CLR 1 at 17–18 [25]–[27]. 88 Alford v Magee (1952) 85 CLR 437 at 466; [1952]......
-
Zn v Secretary For Justice And Others
...based on where the Court is based, in Strasbourg, France. [140] Applicant’s Skeleton Argument for Substantive Hearing,[8]; R v Wei Tang [2008] HCA 39. [141] Applicant’s Skeleton Argument for Substantive Hearing, [142] Applicant’s Skeleton Argument for Substantive Hearing, [20]. [143]href="J......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
The Rhetoric of Slavery in the 21st Century
...to from 10 years to 9 years’ imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 5 years. 83 Section 270.3. 84 Section 270.1. 85 Section 270.6. 86 [2008] HCA 39 (Austrl.). [2019] Irish Judicial Studies Journal Vol 3(2) 26 IRISH JUDICIAL STUDIES JOURNAL As in the UK, Australia introduced in recent tim......
-
The Cogs and Wheels of Reflexive Law – Business Disclosure under the Modern Slavery Act
...of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right ofownership are exercised' (Article 1).14 The Queen v. Tang [2008] H.C.A. 39, para. 20, per Gleeson CJ.15 Home Office, Modern Slavery and Supply Chains Consultation (2015) 7. Section 1of the MSA directly employs the offen......
-
Dancing on the Borders of Article 4: Human Trafficking and the European Court of Human Rights in the Rantsev Case
...is a form of abuse of a lower threshold as opposed to slavery, servitude a nd forced labour.78 If this argument 74 e Queen v. Tang [2008] HCA 39, 28August 2008 M 5/2008, Gleensone CJ, at par a. 16.75 e Queen v. Tang [2008] HCA 39, 28August 2008 M5/20 08, Gleensone CJ, at para . 25.76 ......