The "Sam Hawk"

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Judgment Date2016
Neutral Citation[2016] FCAFC 26
Date2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Prior v South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council Aboriginal Corporation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 June 2020
    ...[2013] FCA 189 Rogers v Assets Loan Co Pty Ltd (2008) 250 ALR 82; [2008] FCA 1305 “Sam Hawk” v Reiter Petroleum Inc (2016) 246 FCR 337; [2016] FCAFC 26 Singh v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (2011) 282 ALR 56; [2011] FCA 883 SK Foods LP......
  • Spamat S.R.L. v The owners and all persons claiming an interest in the M.v Alimirante Storni
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 9 March 2020
    ......However, there are many maritime claims which do not. The distinction between claims giving rise to a maritime lien and other claims is of some significance to the nature of the appeal being brought in this case. That issue is similar to the one which arose in an Australian case, the “Sam Hawk”, [2016] 2 Lloyds Law Reports, 638 where one of the issues was whether a contract between parties who had no interest in the ship could create a maritime lien, in rem, in relation to that ship which bound the owner of the ship. The Court observed that this was not an issue which could be ......
  • The "Posidon" and another matter
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 7 June 2017
    ...Liens and Claims (1st Ed, Business Law Communications Ltd, 1985) at p 405). Similarly, in The Ship “Sam Hawk” v Reiter Petroleum Inc [2016] FCAFC 26 at [79], the majority members of the Federal Court of Australia made the following comments which I accept to be applicable in Singapore as we......
  • Hii v Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 October 2020
    ...the proceedings; Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156 at [30]; The Ship “Sam Hawk” v Reiter Petroleum Inc [2016] FCAFC 26 at [222]. Therefore, the applicant seeks leave to appeal the decision made by Justice Logan in QUD488/2019 on 4 March 2020 summarily dismissing ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Transport & Logistics News - March 2017: part 1
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 April 2017
    ...to claims of US$100,000-US$400,000, unless the parties agree otherwise. Australian decisions Reiter Petroleum Inc v The Ship "Sam Hawk" [2016] FCAFC 26 The Full Court of the Federal Court overturned the first instance decision of McKerracher J in late September 2016. See the case note of th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT