Thompson v Bankstown Corporation

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1953] HCA 5,1953-0305 HCA B
Date1953
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • Munnings v Hydro-Electric Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Rich v Commissioner for Railways (Nsw)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • British Railways Board v Herrington
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 February 1972
    ...case in which the Privy Council, on a New South Wales Appeal, may appear to have taken a step back. The High Court cases are Thompson v. Bankstown Corporation (1953) 87 C.L.R. 619, Rich v. Commissioner for Railways (N.S.W.) (1959) 101 C.L.R. 135, Commissioner for Railways (N.S.W.) v. Cardey......
  • British Railways Board v Herrington
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 December 1970
    ...274); Rich v. Commissioner for Railways (N.S.W.) (101 Commonwealth Law Reports 135) and Thompson v. Bankstown Corporation (87 Commonwealth Law Reports 619). In Cardey's case, Chief Justice Dixon said (at page 286): "The rule remains that a man trespasses at his own risk and the occupier is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT