Toby David Roberts v Nathan Robert Smorhun
| Jurisdiction | Australian Capital Territory |
| Judge | Refshauge J |
| Judgment Date | 01 November 2013 |
| Court | Supreme Court of ACT |
| Docket Number | No. SCA 59 of 2013 |
| Date | 01 November 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
The Queen v James Conrad Loulanting
...to be respected. Further, such orders are normally made in the context of family violence and, as I pointed out in Roberts v Smorhun [2013] ACTSC 218 at [120]–[122], this is this is a serious problem which the integrity of the Domestic Violence Order system can help to address. 42 In this ......
-
Richard Bedford v Philip Earle and Brett Ford
...3 NTLR 68 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pettitt v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 Ring v Beath [2009] ACTSC 19 Roberts v Smorhun [2013] ACTSC 218 R v Campbell [2010] ACTCA 20 R v Gray [1977] VR 225 R v Harris (2007) 171 A Crim R 267 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Shanno......
-
Jeffrey John Smith v Yana Eric O'Dell
...v Watkins [2014] ACTSC 361 McDonald v Vandervalk (No 1) [2014] ACTSC 67 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Roberts v Smorhun [2013] ACTSC 218 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v McMahon [2014] ACTSC 280 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327 R v Riddle (2010) ......
-
The Queen v Todd Elphick
...299 Quinn (Unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal, WA, Wallace, Pidgeon and Rowland JJ, Library No: 8361, 11 July 1990) Roberts v Smorhun [2013] ACTSC 218 R v Clinch (1994) 72 A Crim R 301 R v Elphick [2014] ACTSC 372 R v Hamid (2006) 164 A Crim R 179 R v Hopkins (2008) 22 NTLR 125 R v MAK (2......
Get Started for Free