Transport Workers’ Union of New South Wales v Australian Industrial Relations Commission

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date06 March 2008
Neutral Citation[2008] FCAFC 26
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 Febrero 2018
    ...PC 347 at 360 [ 14 ER 727 at 732]. See also Transport Workers' Union of New South Wales v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2008) 166 FCR 108 at 127–128 39 Cf Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation v Minister of State for Industrial Relation......
  • Pipe Networks Pty Ltd v 148 Brunswick Street Pty Ltd (Trustee)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 2 Mayo 2019
    ...v Somerfield Stores Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1732 Transport Workers’ Union of New South Wales v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2008) 166 FCR 108 Vautin v BY Winddown, Inc. (formerly Bertram Yachts) (No 4) [2018] FCA 426 Western Export Services Inc v Jireh International Pty Ltd (2011......
  • Sydney Ferries Corporation v Australian Maritime Officers Union
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 Mayo 2008
    ...Corporation (1989) 22 FCR 209 referred to Transport Workers’ Union of New South Wales v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2008] FCAFC 26 referred to Miller v University of New South Wales (2003) 127 IR 432 referred to SYDNEY FERRIES CORPORATION v AUSTRALIAN MARITIME OFFICERS UNION......
  • Rahman v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 4 Noviembre 2008
    ...Appeals Tribunal. 9 In Transport Workers’ Union of New South Wales v Australian Industrial Relations Commission and Others (2008) 166 FCR 108 Gray and North JJ observed at [55] that prerogative writs might be refused in the discretion of the Court when it would be futile to grant them. Thei......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT