TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 20 February 2007 |
| Neutral Citation | [2007] FCA 151 |
| Court | Federal Court |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCA 151
CONTRACT – whether contract rescinded or varied by subsequent contract – intention of parties
COPYRIGHT – ownership – whether works authored by employee or contractor – amendments by copyright owner – whether amendments create new copyright – reproduction – whether implied license to reproduce – compilations of data – whether sufficient skill, judgment and labour – whether reproduced – assignment of copyright – whether to be inferred – secondary infringement – authorization – significance of control
DAMAGES – copyright infringement – method of calculation - loss of business – secondary loss – additional damages – when awarded
EVIDENCE – license – whether implied from custom and usage – whether inferred from conduct – onus of proof
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – chose in action – assignment – where cause of action ancillary to right or interest in property – whether void for maintenance or champerty
TORT – accessorial liability of directors – joint tortfeasors – concerted action – procuring or inducing infringement – whether separate tort – unlawful interference with trade or business – conspiracy – unlawful purpose – unlawful means
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), ss 35(6), 101(1A), 115, 196
Copyright Act 1911 (UK), s 2(3)
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 5(2), 23
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 53, 51AA
Acohs Pty Ltd v RA Bashford Consulting Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 352
Allen Manufacturing Co Pty Ltd v McCallum & Co Pty Ltd (2001) 53 IPR 400
Amstrad Consumer Electronics PLC v The British Phonographic Industry Limited[1986] FSR 159
Ansell Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allies Rubber Industries Pty Ltd [1967] VR 37
Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Australian Federation of Air Pilots (No 2) [1991] 2 VR 636
A-One Accessory Imports Pty Ltd v Off Road Imports Pty Ltd(1996) 65 FCR 478
Aquaculture Corporation v New Zealand Green Mussel Co Ltd[1990] 3 NZLR 299
Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2)[1990] 1 AC 109
Autocaps (Aust) Pty Ltd v Pro-Kit Pty Ltd (1999) 46 IPR 339
Avel Pty Ltd v Multicon Amusements Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 88
Baltic Shipping Co. v Dillon(1993) 176 CLR 344
Beloff v Pressdram Ltd [1973] RPC 765
Boardman v Phipps[1967] 2 AC 46
Canadian Performing Right Society Limited v Canadian National Exhibition Association [1938] 2 DLR 621
Campbell’s Cash and Carry Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 ALR 58
Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & Co[1991] 3 SCR 534
CBS Inc v Ames Records & Tapes Ltd[1982] Ch 91
CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad Consumer Electronics Plc[1988] AC 1013
C Evans & Sons Ltd v Spritebrand Ltd[1985] 1 WLR 317
City of Adelaide v The Australasian Performing Right Association Limited(1928) 40 CLR 481
Clark v Newsamand Edwards(1847) 154 ER 55
Colbeam Palmer Ltd v Stock Affiliates Pty Ltd(1968) 122 CLR 25
Concrete Systems Pty Ltd v Devon Symonds Holdings Ltd(1978) 20 ALR 677
Connor v Blackstown District Hospital [1971] 1 NSWLR 713
Con-Stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 226
Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV v Export Credit Guarantee Department [2000] 1 AC 486
Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company Limited v Veitch[1942] AC 435
Dart Industries Inc v The Décor Corporation Pty Ltd(1993) 179 CLR 101
Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2002) 192 ALR 433
Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No 3)[2006] QB 125
English v Dedham Vale Properties Ltd[1978] 1 WLR 93
Evans v E Hulton & Co Limited (1924) 131 LT 534
Falcon v Famous Players Film Company[1926] 2 KB 474
Fatimi Pty Ltd v Bryant (2004) 59 NSWLR 678
Fenning Film Service Ltd v Wolverhampton, Walsall & District Cinemas Ltd[1914] 3 KB 1171
General Tire & Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co Ltd [1976] RPC 197
Gerber Garment Technology Inc v Lectra Systems Ltd[1995] RPC 383
Glegg v Bromley[1912] 3 KB 474
H Blacklock & Co Ltd v C Arthur Pearson Ltd[1915] 2 Ch 376
Interfirm Comparison (Australia) Pty Ltd v Law Society of New South Wales[1977] RPC 137
Interlego AG v Tyco Industries Inc[1989] AC 217
JT Stratford & Son Ltd v Lindley[1965] AC 269
Lamb v Cotogno(1987) 164 CLR 1
Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No 2)[1982] AC 173
Lonrho Plc v Fayed[1992] 1 AC 448
Lumley v Gye(1853) 118 ER 749
Majeau Carrying Co Pty Ltd v Coastal Rutile Ltd(1973) 129 CLR 48
Malone v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (No 2) [1979] 2 All ER 620
Marrinan v Vibart[1963] 1 QB 234
MCA Records Inc v Charly Records Ltd[2003] 1 BCLC 93
McKernan v Fraser(1931) 46 CLR 343
Mogul Steamship Company Limited v McGregor Gow & Co[1892] AC 25
Monckton v Pathe Freres Pathephone Limited[1914] 1 KB 395
Moorgate Tobacco Co Limited v Philip Morris Limited (No 2)(1984) 156 CLR 414
Mulcahy v The Queen(1868) LR 3 HL 306
Mustad & Son v Dosen[1964] 1 WLR 109
Nocton v Lord Ashburton[1914] AC 932
Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation(1963) 109 CLR 9
Olga Investments Pty Ltd v Citipower Ltd [1998] 3 VR 485
Performing Right Society Limited v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Limited[1924] 1 KB 1
Performing Right Society Limited v Mitchell and Booker (Palais de Danse) Limited[1924] 1 KB 762
Performing Rights Society Ltd v Bradford Corporation [1921] MacG Cop Cas 309
Petry v Lamont (1841) 174 ER 424
PLG Research Ltd v Ardon International Ltd[1993] FSR 197
Poulton v Commonwealth(1953) 89 CLR 540
Pratt v British Medical Association[1919] 1 KB 244
Quinn v Leathem[1901] AC 495
R v Associated Northern Collieries(1911) 14 CLR 387
RCA Corporation v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd[1982] RPC 91
Redrow Homes Ltd v Betts Brothers Plc[1999] 1 AC 197
Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd v Rickard Hails Moretti Pty Ltd(2004) 220 ALR 267
Rookes v Barnard[1964] AC 1129
Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd (2000) 177 ALR 231
Said v Butt[1920] 3 KB 497
Sands & McDougall Pty Ltd v Robinson (1917) 23 CLR 49
Seager v Copydex Ltd (No 2) [1969] RPC 250
Sir Charles Stanley’s Case(1663) 84 ER 1094
Sir John Haydon’s Case(1612) 77 ER 1150
Smith Kline & French Laboratories (Australia) Ltd v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545
Stovin-Bradford v Volpoint Properties Ltd[1971] Ch 1007
Summers v Commonwealth(1918) 25 CLR 144
Sutherland Publishing Company Ltd v Caxton Publishing Company Ltd[1936] Ch 323
Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull AustraliaPty Ltd[2002] FCAFC 157
Tallerman & Co Pty Ltd v Nathan’s Merchandise (Victoria) Pty Ltd(1957) 98 CLR 93
Taypar Pty Ltd v Santic (1989) 17 IPR 146
The Koursk[1924] P140
Thompson v Australian CapitalTelevision Pty Limited(1996) 186 CLR 574
Thornley v Tilley(1925) 36 CLR 1
Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse[1982] AC 679
TR Flanagan Smash Repairs Pty Ltd v Jones [2000] FCA 625
TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3fold Resources Pty Ltd (2003) 57 IPR 530
TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] FCA 1101
Unilever Plc v Gillette (UK) Limited[1989] RPC 583
United Dominions Corporation (Jamaica) Ltd v Shoucair[1969] 1 AC 340
University of London Press v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 601
University of New South Wales v Moorhouse (1975) 133 CLR 1
Vigneux v Canadian Performing Right Society Limited[1945] AC 108
WEA International Inc v Hanimex Corporation Ltd(1987) 17 FCR 274
Williams v Hursey(1959) 103 CLR 30
Williams v Moss Empires Limited[1915] 3 KB 242
Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd[1998] 1 WLR 830
Winstone v Wurlitzer Automatic Phonograph Company of Australia Proprietary Limited[1946] VLR 338
XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd(1985) 155 CLR 448
Young v Tockassie(1905) 2 CLR 470
Holdsworths A History of English Law (2nd ed., 1966 reprint) vol VIII
Laddie, Prescott & Vitoria, The Modern Law of Copyright, (1980)
VID 147 of 2003
FINKELSTEIN J
20 FEBRUARY 2007
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | |
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY | VID 147 of 2003 |
BETWEEN: | TS & B RETAIL SYSTEMS PTY LTD Applicant |
AND: | 3FOLD RESOURCES PTY LTD, PETER VANDERZAAG, FRANCIS D'MELLO and GARY WILLIAM SMITH Respondents |
JUDGE: | FINKELSTEIN J |
DATE: | 20 FEBRUARY 2007 |
PLACE: | MELBOURNE |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
1This case is principally a copyright infringement action. The applicant, TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd (TS&B Retail), alleges that the corporate respondent, 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (3Fold), copied 234 manufacturing drawings and 5 tables of data in which TS&B Retail holds copyright. TS&B Retail says 3Fold used the drawings and data to manufacture, supply and install shop fittings (including interior fittings, displays, stock presentations and shelves) for retailers who would otherwise have purchased those products and services from TS&B Retail. The main case, however, is against the individual respondents. They are the directors of 3Fold and the only ones likely to have assets to satisfy any award of damages TS&B Retail is able to recover. The case against them is that they procured 3Fold to breach the copyright.
2In addition to the copyright infringement claim, there are claims for breach of confidence and subsidiary claims in misleading or deceptive conduct, misleading or false representations and unconscionable conduct in contravention respectively of ss 52, 53 and 51AA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). The Trade Practices Act claims were not seriously pressed at trial. TS&B Retail accepts in the event it succeeds in its copyright action, the other claims will become redundant.
3It became common ground during the course of the proceeding that the 234 drawings and the 5 tables were copied. The action is...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Tosich v Tasman Investment Management Limited
...turn upon the point in issue here. 31 The decision of Finkelstein J in TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) (2007) 158 FCR 444 may be seen as an example of the category of connection with property. There, the assignment of a cause of action for breach of confidenti......
-
Krueger Transport Equipment Pty Ltd v Glen Cameron Storage & Distribution Pty Ltd (No 2)
...436 cited Tamawood Ltd v Henley Arch Pty Ltd (2004) 61 IPR 378 referred to TS&B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) (2007) 158 FCR 444 followed Balkin and Davis, Law of Torts (3rd ed 2004) Laddie, The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs (3rd ed 2000) Nimmer and Nimmer, N......
-
Garrett v Emap Australia Pty Ltd t/as Zoo Weekly
...Pty Ltd (1995) 59 FCR 49 Rogers v Asset Loan Co Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 195 T S & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) (2007) 158 FCR 444 Taypar Pty Ltd v Santic (1989) 21 FCR 4 Telephonic Communicators International Pty Ltd v Motor Solutions Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 942......
-
Boyapati v Rockefeller Management Corporation (No 2)
...to Autodesk Australia Pty Ltd v Cheung (1990) 94 ALR 472 referred to TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) (2007) 158 FCR 444 Prior v Sheldon (2000) 48 IPR 301 cited Sony Entertainment (Australia) Ltd v Smith (2005) 64 IPR 18 cited Ravenscroft v Herbert and New Engl......