TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date20 February 2007
Neutral Citation[2007] FCA 151
CourtFederal Court

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCA 151



CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – whether property – whether assignable – protection of confidentiality in hands of transferee

CONTRACT – whether contract rescinded or varied by subsequent contract – intention of parties

COPYRIGHT – ownership – whether works authored by employee or contractor – amendments by copyright owner – whether amendments create new copyright – reproduction – whether implied license to reproduce – compilations of data – whether sufficient skill, judgment and labour – whether reproduced – assignment of copyright – whether to be inferred – secondary infringement – authorization – significance of control

DAMAGES – copyright infringement – method of calculation - loss of business – secondary loss – additional damages – when awarded

EVIDENCE – license – whether implied from custom and usage – whether inferred from conduct – onus of proof

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – chose in action – assignment – where cause of action ancillary to right or interest in property – whether void for maintenance or champerty

TORT – accessorial liability of directors – joint tortfeasors – concerted action – procuring or inducing infringement – whether separate tort – unlawful interference with trade or business – conspiracy – unlawful purpose – unlawful means

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), ss 35(6), 101(1A), 115, 196

Copyright Act 1911 (UK), s 2(3)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 5(2), 23

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 53, 51AA



Acohs Pty Ltd v RA Bashford Consulting Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 352

Allen Manufacturing Co Pty Ltd v McCallum & Co Pty Ltd (2001) 53 IPR 400

Amstrad Consumer Electronics PLC v The British Phonographic Industry Limited[1986] FSR 159

Ansell Rubber Co Pty Ltd v Allies Rubber Industries Pty Ltd [1967] VR 37

Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Australian Federation of Air Pilots (No 2) [1991] 2 VR 636

A-One Accessory Imports Pty Ltd v Off Road Imports Pty Ltd(1996) 65 FCR 478

Aquaculture Corporation v New Zealand Green Mussel Co Ltd[1990] 3 NZLR 299

Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2)[1990] 1 AC 109

Autocaps (Aust) Pty Ltd v Pro-Kit Pty Ltd (1999) 46 IPR 339

Avel Pty Ltd v Multicon Amusements Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 88

Baltic Shipping Co. v Dillon(1993) 176 CLR 344

Beloff v Pressdram Ltd [1973] RPC 765

Boardman v Phipps[1967] 2 AC 46

Canadian Performing Right Society Limited v Canadian National Exhibition Association [1938] 2 DLR 621

Campbell’s Cash and Carry Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 ALR 58

Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & Co[1991] 3 SCR 534

CBS Inc v Ames Records & Tapes Ltd[1982] Ch 91

CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad Consumer Electronics Plc[1988] AC 1013

C Evans & Sons Ltd v Spritebrand Ltd[1985] 1 WLR 317

City of Adelaide v The Australasian Performing Right Association Limited(1928) 40 CLR 481

Clark v Newsamand Edwards(1847) 154 ER 55

Colbeam Palmer Ltd v Stock Affiliates Pty Ltd(1968) 122 CLR 25

Concrete Systems Pty Ltd v Devon Symonds Holdings Ltd(1978) 20 ALR 677

Connor v Blackstown District Hospital [1971] 1 NSWLR 713

Con-Stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 226

Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV v Export Credit Guarantee Department [2000] 1 AC 486

Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company Limited v Veitch[1942] AC 435

Dart Industries Inc v The Décor Corporation Pty Ltd(1993) 179 CLR 101

Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2002) 192 ALR 433

Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No 3)[2006] QB 125

English v Dedham Vale Properties Ltd[1978] 1 WLR 93

Evans v E Hulton & Co Limited (1924) 131 LT 534

Falcon v Famous Players Film Company[1926] 2 KB 474

Fatimi Pty Ltd v Bryant (2004) 59 NSWLR 678

Fenning Film Service Ltd v Wolverhampton, Walsall & District Cinemas Ltd[1914] 3 KB 1171

General Tire & Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co Ltd [1976] RPC 197

Gerber Garment Technology Inc v Lectra Systems Ltd[1995] RPC 383

Glegg v Bromley[1912] 3 KB 474

H Blacklock & Co Ltd v C Arthur Pearson Ltd[1915] 2 Ch 376

Interfirm Comparison (Australia) Pty Ltd v Law Society of New South Wales[1977] RPC 137

Interlego AG v Tyco Industries Inc[1989] AC 217

JT Stratford & Son Ltd v Lindley[1965] AC 269

Lamb v Cotogno(1987) 164 CLR 1

Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No 2)[1982] AC 173

Lonrho Plc v Fayed[1992] 1 AC 448

Lumley v Gye(1853) 118 ER 749

Majeau Carrying Co Pty Ltd v Coastal Rutile Ltd(1973) 129 CLR 48

Malone v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (No 2) [1979] 2 All ER 620

Marrinan v Vibart[1963] 1 QB 234

MCA Records Inc v Charly Records Ltd[2003] 1 BCLC 93

McKernan v Fraser(1931) 46 CLR 343

Mogul Steamship Company Limited v McGregor Gow & Co[1892] AC 25

Monckton v Pathe Freres Pathephone Limited[1914] 1 KB 395

Moorgate Tobacco Co Limited v Philip Morris Limited (No 2)(1984) 156 CLR 414

Mulcahy v The Queen(1868) LR 3 HL 306

Mustad & Son v Dosen[1964] 1 WLR 109

Nocton v Lord Ashburton[1914] AC 932

Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation(1963) 109 CLR 9

Olga Investments Pty Ltd v Citipower Ltd [1998] 3 VR 485

Performing Right Society Limited v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Limited[1924] 1 KB 1

Performing Right Society Limited v Mitchell and Booker (Palais de Danse) Limited[1924] 1 KB 762

Performing Rights Society Ltd v Bradford Corporation [1921] MacG Cop Cas 309

Petry v Lamont (1841) 174 ER 424

PLG Research Ltd v Ardon International Ltd[1993] FSR 197

Poulton v Commonwealth(1953) 89 CLR 540

Pratt v British Medical Association[1919] 1 KB 244

Quinn v Leathem[1901] AC 495

R v Associated Northern Collieries(1911) 14 CLR 387

RCA Corporation v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd[1982] RPC 91

Redrow Homes Ltd v Betts Brothers Plc[1999] 1 AC 197

Rickard Constructions Pty Ltd v Rickard Hails Moretti Pty Ltd(2004) 220 ALR 267

Rookes v Barnard[1964] AC 1129

Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd (2000) 177 ALR 231

Said v Butt[1920] 3 KB 497

Sands & McDougall Pty Ltd v Robinson (1917) 23 CLR 49

Seager v Copydex Ltd (No 2) [1969] RPC 250

Sir Charles Stanley’s Case(1663) 84 ER 1094

Sir John Haydon’s Case(1612) 77 ER 1150

Smith Kline & French Laboratories (Australia) Ltd v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545

Stovin-Bradford v Volpoint Properties Ltd[1971] Ch 1007

Summers v Commonwealth(1918) 25 CLR 144

Sutherland Publishing Company Ltd v Caxton Publishing Company Ltd[1936] Ch 323

Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull AustraliaPty Ltd[2002] FCAFC 157

Tallerman & Co Pty Ltd v Nathan’s Merchandise (Victoria) Pty Ltd(1957) 98 CLR 93

Taypar Pty Ltd v Santic (1989) 17 IPR 146

The Koursk[1924] P140

Thompson v Australian CapitalTelevision Pty Limited(1996) 186 CLR 574

Thornley v Tilley(1925) 36 CLR 1

Trendtex Trading Corporation v Credit Suisse[1982] AC 679

TR Flanagan Smash Repairs Pty Ltd v Jones [2000] FCA 625

TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3fold Resources Pty Ltd (2003) 57 IPR 530

TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] FCA 1101

Unilever Plc v Gillette (UK) Limited[1989] RPC 583

United Dominions Corporation (Jamaica) Ltd v Shoucair[1969] 1 AC 340

University of London Press v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 601

University of New South Wales v Moorhouse (1975) 133 CLR 1

Vigneux v Canadian Performing Right Society Limited[1945] AC 108

WEA International Inc v Hanimex Corporation Ltd(1987) 17 FCR 274

Williams v Hursey(1959) 103 CLR 30

Williams v Moss Empires Limited[1915] 3 KB 242

Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd[1998] 1 WLR 830

Winstone v Wurlitzer Automatic Phonograph Company of Australia Proprietary Limited[1946] VLR 338

XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd(1985) 155 CLR 448

Young v Tockassie(1905) 2 CLR 470

Holdsworths A History of English Law (2nd ed., 1966 reprint) vol VIII

Laddie, Prescott & Vitoria, The Modern Law of Copyright, (1980)




TS & B RETAIL SYSTEMS PTY LTD v 3FOLD RESOURCES PTY LTD, PETER VANDERZAAG, FRANCIS D'MELLO and GARY WILLIAM SMITH

VID 147 of 2003

FINKELSTEIN J

20 FEBRUARY 2007

MELBOURNE



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

VID 147 of 2003

BETWEEN:

TS & B RETAIL SYSTEMS PTY LTD

Applicant

AND:

3FOLD RESOURCES PTY LTD,

PETER VANDERZAAG,

FRANCIS D'MELLO

and GARY WILLIAM SMITH

Respondents

JUDGE:

FINKELSTEIN J

DATE:

20 FEBRUARY 2007

PLACE:

MELBOURNE


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

1This case is principally a copyright infringement action. The applicant, TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd (TS&B Retail), alleges that the corporate respondent, 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (3Fold), copied 234 manufacturing drawings and 5 tables of data in which TS&B Retail holds copyright. TS&B Retail says 3Fold used the drawings and data to manufacture, supply and install shop fittings (including interior fittings, displays, stock presentations and shelves) for retailers who would otherwise have purchased those products and services from TS&B Retail. The main case, however, is against the individual respondents. They are the directors of 3Fold and the only ones likely to have assets to satisfy any award of damages TS&B Retail is able to recover. The case against them is that they procured 3Fold to breach the copyright.

2In addition to the copyright infringement claim, there are claims for breach of confidence and subsidiary claims in misleading or deceptive conduct, misleading or false representations and unconscionable conduct in contravention respectively of ss 52, 53 and 51AA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). The Trade Practices Act claims were not seriously pressed at trial. TS&B Retail accepts in the event it succeeds in its copyright action, the other claims will become redundant.

3It became common ground during the course of the proceeding that the 234 drawings and the 5 tables were copied. The action is...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Tosich v Tasman Investment Management Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 20 March 2008
    ...turn upon the point in issue here. 31 The decision of Finkelstein J in TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) (2007) 158 FCR 444 may be seen as an example of the category of connection with property. There, the assignment of a cause of action for breach of confidenti......
  • Krueger Transport Equipment Pty Ltd v Glen Cameron Storage & Distribution Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 October 2008
    ...436 cited Tamawood Ltd v Henley Arch Pty Ltd (2004) 61 IPR 378 referred to TS&B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) (2007) 158 FCR 444 followed Balkin and Davis, Law of Torts (3rd ed 2004) Laddie, The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs (3rd ed 2000) Nimmer and Nimmer, N......
  • Garrett v Emap Australia Pty Ltd t/as Zoo Weekly
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 2 April 2008
    ...Pty Ltd (1995) 59 FCR 49 Rogers v Asset Loan Co Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 195 T S & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) (2007) 158 FCR 444 Taypar Pty Ltd v Santic (1989) 21 FCR 4 Telephonic Communicators International Pty Ltd v Motor Solutions Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 942......
  • Boyapati v Rockefeller Management Corporation (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 September 2008
    ...to Autodesk Australia Pty Ltd v Cheung (1990) 94 ALR 472 referred to TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3) (2007) 158 FCR 444 Prior v Sheldon (2000) 48 IPR 301 cited Sony Entertainment (Australia) Ltd v Smith (2005) 64 IPR 18 cited Ravenscroft v Herbert and New Engl......
  • Get Started for Free