Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Tulk v Tulk

Cited in 19 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Year1907
Date1907
CourtUnspecified Court (Australia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Mcilroy v Mcilroy
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Deery v Deery
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Tan Lee Tiang v Chia Thuan Hwa
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 October 1993
    ...... The marriage relationship, for legal purposes, is characterized by the consortium vitae. Its elements were well expressed by Cussen J in Tulk v Tulk at p 65: . . In deciding whether there was at any specified date an existing matrimonial relationship, it is, I think, right to ......
  • Cooper v. Cooper, (1998) 168 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 58 (NFFC)
    • Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • 18 August 1998
    ...345, refd to. [para. 22]. McBride v. McBride (1994), 155 N.B.R.(2d) 273; 398 A.P.R. 273 (Fam. Div.), consd. [para. 24]. Tulk v. Tulk, [1907] V.L.R. 64, refd to. [para. Bellis v. Innes (1980), 21 R.F.L.(2d) 40 (B.C. Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 26]. Molodowich v. Penttinen (1970), 17 R.F.L.(2d)......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT