Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1980-1028 HCA B,[1980] HCA 40 |
| Date | 1980 |
| Year | 1980 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 cases
- M38-2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
- Miller v Tcn Channel Nine Pty Ltd
-
Williams v Commonwealth of Australia
...421; [1922] HCA 62. 328 (1925) 37 CLR 233; [1925] HCA 55. See also, on application for special leave to appeal to the Privy Council, (1925) 32 ALR 1. 329 (1934) 52 CLR 455 at 330 (1934) 52 CLR 455 at 508. 331 (1934) 52 CLR 455 at 496 per Rich J, 502–503 per Starke J, 517–518 per McTiernan ......
-
Monis v The Queen; Droudis v The Queen
...Authority of NSW (1975) 134 CLR 559 at 581 per Barwick CJ, 607–608, 614–615 per Mason J, 620–621 per Jacobs J; [1975] HCA 45; Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board (1980) 145 CLR 266 at 281–282 per Barwick CJ; [1980] HCA 40; Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1990) 169 CLR 436 at 472......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
...contract for theconstruction of cargo barquent ines in Kidman v Commonwealth (1925) 37 CLR 233 (ap pealed inKidman v Commonwealth (1925) 32 ALR 1) and the contracts made in the administration of depart-ments under s 64, as to which see Williams (No 1) (2012) 248 CLR 156, 211–12 [74] (French......
-
Proportionality and the Separation of Powers in Constitutional Review: Examining the Role of Judicial Deference
...and commerce cases from the outset: see, eg, Stone, above n 7, 681–2 (political communication); Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board (1980) 145 CLR 266, 306 (Stephen and Mason JJ) (‘Uebergang’); Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360, 409 (Mason CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gau......
-
Some Australian reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis.
...v. New South Wales (No. 2), [1955] HCA 28, 93 C.L.R. 127 at 159, 171, 219 [Hughes and Vale (No. 2)]; Uebergang v. Australian Wheat Board, [1980] HCA 40, 145 C.L.R. 266 at 281, 305, 32 A.L.R. 1 [Uebergang]; Miller v. TCN Channel Nine Pty. Ltd., [1986] HCA 60, 161 C.L.R. 556 at 629, 67 A.L.R.......
-
Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
...J re: whether miscarriage of justice arose from non-adjournment to permit securing of counsel); Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board (1980) 145 CLR 266 (Murphy J re: judicial development of public policy tests); 326 Federal Law Review Volume 33 ________________________________________________......
Get Started for Free