Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board

Cited authorities 31 Cited in 26 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1980-1028 HCA B,[1980] HCA 40
Date1980
Year1980
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • M38-2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Miller v Tcn Channel Nine Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Maloney v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 19 June 2013
    ...559 at 616; [1975] HCA 45; Rowe v Electoral Commissioner (2010) 243 CLR 1 at 134 [438], referring to Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board (1980) 145 CLR 266 at 306; [1980] HCA 217 (2013) 87 ALJR 340 at 408 [347]; 295 ALR 259 at 346. 218 Queensland, Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates ......
  • Monis v The Queen; Droudis v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 27 February 2013
    ...Authority of NSW (1975) 134 CLR 559 at 581 per Barwick CJ, 607–608, 614–615 per Mason J, 620–621 per Jacobs J; [1975] HCA 45; Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board (1980) 145 CLR 266 at 281–282 per Barwick CJ; [1980] HCA 40; Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1990) 169 CLR 436 at 472......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...contract for theconstruction of cargo barquent ines in Kidman v Commonwealth (1925) 37 CLR 233 (ap pealed inKidman v Commonwealth (1925) 32 ALR 1) and the contracts made in the administration of depart-ments under s 64, as to which see Williams (No 1) (2012) 248 CLR 156, 211–12 [74] (French......
  • Proportionality and the Separation of Powers in Constitutional Review: Examining the Role of Judicial Deference
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 45-2, June 2017
    • 1 June 2017
    ...and commerce cases from the outset: see, eg, Stone, above n 7, 681–2 (political communication); Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board (1980) 145 CLR 266, 306 (Stephen and Mason JJ) (‘Uebergang’); Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360, 409 (Mason CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gau......
  • Some Australian reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 55 No. 3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...v. New South Wales (No. 2), [1955] HCA 28, 93 C.L.R. 127 at 159, 171, 219 [Hughes and Vale (No. 2)]; Uebergang v. Australian Wheat Board, [1980] HCA 40, 145 C.L.R. 266 at 281, 305, 32 A.L.R. 1 [Uebergang]; Miller v. TCN Channel Nine Pty. Ltd., [1986] HCA 60, 161 C.L.R. 556 at 629, 67 A.L.R.......
  • Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...J re: whether miscarriage of justice arose from non-adjournment to permit securing of counsel); Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board (1980) 145 CLR 266 (Murphy J re: judicial development of public policy tests); 326 Federal Law Review Volume 33 ________________________________________________......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT