University of New South Wales v Moorhouse

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1975] HCA 26,1975-0801 HCA A
Year1975
Date1975

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
115 cases
4 firm's commentaries
5 books & journal articles
  • THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF FAIR DEALING
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Broadcasting Ltd[1990] Ch 141 at 148–149; Sillitoe v McGraw-Hill Book Co[1983] FSR 545 at 563; University of New South Wales v Moorhouse(1975) 133 CLR 1 at 12; Beloff v Pressdram[1973] FSR 33 at 61; Hubbard v Vosper[1972] 2 QB 84 at 94. 80 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c 48) (UK)......
  • REVISITING AUTHORISATION LIABILITY IN COPYRIGHT LAW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2012, December - January 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...the Copyright Act 1968 (Act No 63 of 1968) (Cth) (Aust) – as endorsed by the High Court in University of New South Wales v Moorhouse(1975) 133 CLR 1. 11Per Gibbs J in University of New South Wales v Moorhouse(1975) 133 CLR 1 at 12. 12 For example, in Sarpy v Holland[1908] 2 Ch 198 at 199, t......
  • A LOOK BACK AT PUBLIC POLICY, THE LEGISLATURE, THE COURTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COPYRIGHT LAW IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2012, December - January 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...assistance or even encouragement”: at [90], per Kitchin J. See also Floyd J in Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar GmbH[2010] EWHC 2911. 127(1975) 133 CLR 1. The library was found to have authorised infringement committed by users of photocopying machines on library premises. 128[1997] 2 SLR(R......
  • Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-3, September 2007
    • 1 September 2007
    ...of Rights', above n 43, 811. 215 Ruhani (2005) 219 ALR 199, [295] (Callinan and Heydon JJ); University of New South Wales v Moorhouse (1975) 133 CLR 1, 9–11 (Gibbs CJ); Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421, 437–9 (Gibbs CJ). 216 Contra Standing Committee on Legal Affairs, ......
  • Get Started for Free