University of New South Wales v Moorhouse
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1975] HCA 26,1975-0801 HCA A |
| Date | 1975 |
| Year | 1975 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
114 cases
4 firm's commentaries
-
Businesses can be held liable for copyright infringement committed by a third party developer: Campaigntrack Pty Ltd v Real Estate Tool Box Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 112
...has it's ordinary, dictionary meaning. That is, to 'sanction, approve or countenance' (see University Of New South Wales v. Moorhouse (1975) 133 CLR 1). Since then, changes have been made to the Copyright Act 1968 ('the Act') which state that: the person's power to prevent the act; the rela......
-
TV Now, copyright later: why the Federal Court found for Optus
...that had reached similar results, and by drawing an analogy to the High Court decision in University of New South Wales v Moorhouse [1975] HCA 26 where Justice Gibbs suggested that it was "impossible to hold" that the University did the act of photocopying when the student copied part of a ......
-
When is an ISP liable for its users' copyright infringements?
...the seminal High Court authority of University of New South Wales v Moorhouse & Angus & Robertson (Publishers) Pty Ltd (1975) 133 CLR 1, and held that it is important to distinguish between the provision of a necessary precondition to infringements occurring, and the provision of th......
-
ISP's: Liability For Copyright Infringement Under The New Digital Agenda Act In Australia In Light Of The Napster Case.
...each user, it is faster to make a local copy and provide access to this, updating the original only when necessary. (1997) 38 IPR 294. (1975) 133 CLR 1 Ibid, Jacobs J at 20 - Section 39A of the Act. Mellor v Australian Broadcasting Commission (1924) All ER Rep 224. RCA Corporation v John Fa......
6 books & journal articles
-
THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF FAIR DEALING
...Broadcasting Ltd[1990] Ch 141 at 148–149; Sillitoe v McGraw-Hill Book Co[1983] FSR 545 at 563; University of New South Wales v Moorhouse(1975) 133 CLR 1 at 12; Beloff v Pressdram[1973] FSR 33 at 61; Hubbard v Vosper[1972] 2 QB 84 at 94. 80 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c 48) (UK)......
-
REVISITING AUTHORISATION LIABILITY IN COPYRIGHT LAW
...the Copyright Act 1968 (Act No 63 of 1968) (Cth) (Aust) – as endorsed by the High Court in University of New South Wales v Moorhouse(1975) 133 CLR 1. 11Per Gibbs J in University of New South Wales v Moorhouse(1975) 133 CLR 1 at 12. 12 For example, in Sarpy v Holland[1908] 2 Ch 198 at 199, t......
-
A LOOK BACK AT PUBLIC POLICY, THE LEGISLATURE, THE COURTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COPYRIGHT LAW IN SINGAPORE
...assistance or even encouragement”: at [90], per Kitchin J. See also Floyd J in Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar GmbH[2010] EWHC 2911. 127(1975) 133 CLR 1. The library was found to have authorised infringement committed by users of photocopying machines on library premises. 128[1997] 2 SLR(R......
-
Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
...of Rights', above n 43, 811. 215 Ruhani (2005) 219 ALR 199, [295] (Callinan and Heydon JJ); University of New South Wales v Moorhouse (1975) 133 CLR 1, 9–11 (Gibbs CJ); Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421, 437–9 (Gibbs CJ). 216 Contra Standing Committee on Legal Affairs, ......
Request a trial to view additional results