University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1985] HCA 28
Date1985
Year1985

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
167 cases
  • Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 September 2012
    ...the substantial issues between the parties are ordinarily settled at the trial’, is evident. That is why, as was said in University of Wollongong v Metwally [No 2]20: ‘It is elementary that a party is bound by the conduct of his case. Except in the most exceptional circumstances, it would b......
  • Fingleton v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 23 June 2005
    ...of law that a party is bound by theconduct of his or her case’81. That rule has been stated by six Justices of the Court in University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2), in the context of civil proceedings, in clear terms82: ‘Except in the most exceptional circumstances, it would be contrary ......
  • James Cook University v Ridd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 22 July 2020
    ...Union of Australia, New South Wales Branch v No Fuss Liquid Waste Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 982 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28; 59 ALJR 481 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 2) [1982] HCA 41; 149 CLR 672 WorkPac Pty Ltd v Skene [2018] FCAFC 131; 264 FCR 536 Date......
  • Get Started for Free