Ure v Commonwealth of Australia and Director of National Parks
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Yates J |
| Judgment Date | 17 March 2015 |
| Date | 17 March 2015 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Yunupingu on behalf of the Gumatj Clan or Estate Group v Commonwealth of Australia
...234 CLR 210 Teori Tau v Commonwealth [1969] HCA 62; 119 CLR 564 Theophanous v Commonwealth [2006] HCA 18; 225 CLR 101 Ure v Commonwealth [2015] FCA 241; 323 ALR 164 Ure v Commonwealth [2016] FCAFC 8; 236 FCR 458 Victoria v Commonwealth [1971] HCA 16; 122 CLR 353 Victoria v Commonwealth (Ind......
-
Ure v Commonwealth of Australia
...Commonwealth of Australia & Anor [2016] HCASL 88 (5 May 2016) Short v Crawley (No 45) [2013] NSWSC 1541 Ure v Commonwealth of Australia [2015] FCA 241; 235 ALR 164 Ure v The Commonwealth of Australia [2016] FCAFC 8; 236 FCR 458 Date of hearing: 23 September 2019 Registry: New South Wales Di......
-
Ure v Commonwealth of Australia and Another
...law, surviving the Commonwealth's subsequent acquisition of sovereignty over these islands. The trial judge dismissed this claim (164 ILR 304). The appellant appealed.4 He continued to claim that such a rule derived from customary international law as defined in Article 38(1)(b) of the Stat......