Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1966
Neutral Citation[1966] HCA 40,1966-0602 HCA D
Year1966
Date1966
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
183 cases
  • Lee Kuan Yew v Tang Liang Hong and Another
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 12 November 1997
    ...561 (folld) TSB Private Bank International SA v Chabra [1992] 1 WLR 231; [1992] 2 All ER 245 (refd) Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118 (folld) Vasoo v Chee Soon Juan Suit No 935 of 1993 (refd) Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Law Society of Singapore [1988] 1 SLR (R) 455; [1988] SL......
  • Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Lee Kuan Yew
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 30 November 1992
  • Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd v Wright Norman and others and another action
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 16 September 1994
    ... ... ` In this connection, I have also noted what Windeyer J said in Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd at p 150 ` ... compensation by damages ... ...
  • Scott v Pedler
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Contempt, defamation, and the dissemination of online poison: part two
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 6 July 2022
    ...while Google was content to watch him do so and earn revenue in the process. Footnotes 1 E.g. Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118; Costello v Random House Australia Pty Ltd [1999] ACTSC 13; Conlon v Advertiser-News Weekend Publishing Co Pty Ltd [2008] SADC 91; Hockey v Fai......
6 books & journal articles
  • Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...to the availability of exemplary or punitive damages under the common law of tort in Australia, see Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118 and Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Uren (1966) 117 CLR 185. In contrast, 'aggravated' damages are theoretically compensatory, and ar......
  • Punitive Damages and the Place of Punishment in Private Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 84-6, November 2021
    • 1 November 2021
    ...to theircounterparts in Australia and Canada when it comes to their assessment. As89 Australia (Uren vJohn Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118, 138 (ar med in AustralianConsolidated Press Ltd vUren [1969] 1 AC 590)); Canada (Paragon Properties Ltd vMagna Envest-ments Ltd (1972) 24 DL......
  • Dead loss: damages for posthumous breach of the moral right of integrity.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 1, August 2016
    • 1 August 2016
    ...18-19 [104]. (84) Robert Stevens, Torts and Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007) 85. See also Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118, 149 ('Uren'), where Windeyer J stipulated that 'aggravated damages are given to compensate the plaintiff when the harm done to him by a ......
  • Breach of Contract and 'Unjust' Enrichment
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. XIII-2010, January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...of the courts in relation to 51 14 July 1976 (HC). 54 (1996) 40 NSWLR 500. 55 (1996) 40 NSWLR 500, at 509. 56 See LRC, note 16. 57 (1966) 117 CLR 118. 58 (1966) 117 CLR 118, at 153. 59 Backwell vAAA [1997] 1 VR 182, at 203. 60 [1992] 2 VR 441. 61 [1992] 2 VR 441, at 448. Trinity College Law......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT