A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1997-0224 HCA A
Year1997
Date1997
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
263 cases
5 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...R v Ladoke (2011) 13 DCLR (NSW) 252, 256 [19] (Haesler DCJ). (140) See also Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Ibrahim (2000) 204 CLR 1, 45-6 [137] (Gummow J); R v Mahendra (2011) 252 FLR 303, 30......
  • A PURPOSIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRETING AUSTRALIA'S COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REGIME.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 2, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...strong reasons for rejecting a narrow conception of ambiguity': at 287. (129) Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225, 239-40 (Dawson J), 253 (McHugh J) ('Applicant A'); Koowarta v Bjelke-Petersen (1982) 153 CLR 168, 265 (Brennan J). Courts will read the......
  • Burdened by Proof: How the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal has Failed Lesbian and Gay Asylum Seekers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-2, June 2003
    • 1 June 2003
    ...passed (during which cases usually referred to Ward) before this view wasjudicially confirmed, again in obiter: Applicant A v MIEA (1997) 190 CLR 225. In 1995, theUNHCR accepted that lesbians and gay men can constitute members of a 'particular socialgroup' and be eligible for protection und......
  • Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...and McHugh, Gummow and Kirby JJ re: Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA); 'Applicant A' v Minister of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 (Brennan CJ, Dawson, McHugh, Gummow and Kirby JJ re: Migration Act 1958 (Cth)); Attorney-General (Cth) v Tse Chu-Fai (1998) 193 CLR 128 (......
  • Get Started for Free