Vairy v Wyong Shire Council

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Kirby J,McHugh J,Gummow J,Hayne J,Callinan,Heydon JJ
Judgment Date21 October 2005
Neutral Citation2005-1021 HCA E,[2005] HCA 62
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS493/2004
Date21 October 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
225 cases
  • Application by Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd (No 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Competition Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • Ruffley v Board of Management of Saint Anne's School
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 May 2017
    ...was reasonably foreseeable, in the sense that the risk was not far-fetched or fanciful.’ As Hayne J put it in Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62 at paragraph 126, when a plaintiff makes a claim for damages for personal injury caused by the defendant's negligence, the court becomes en......
  • Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Dederer
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 30 August 2007
    ...while duties of care may vary in content or scope, they are all to be discharged by the exercise of reasonable care. In Vairy v Wyong Shire Council, McHugh J explained 62: ‘[T]he duty in negligence is generally described as a duty to take reasonable care. In some areas of the law of neglige......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries
  • Beware of the dog - whether the risk of injury foreseeable and not insignificant - Civil Liability Act 2002 s 5B
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 7 April 2012
    ...person would do by way of response to the risk. Footnotes 1 McColl JA, Whealy JA and Tobias AJA 2 [1987] HCA 7 3 [1984] HCA 84 4 [2005] HCA 62 5 [2009] HCA 48 6 [2005] HCA 75 7 [2011] NSWCA 244 Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian Jul......
  • Context, credibility and currency: Factors to consider in the defence of employee injury claims
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 May 2014
    ...objects. 'Hindsight bias' is a common danger in all common law negligence claims. As noted by Hayne J in Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 422, it is necessary to avoid hindsight and to look '... from a time before the accident' so as to properly consider 'the magnitude of the risk......
  • Case Note In The Court Of Appeal Decision Of Rooty Hill RSL Club Ltd v Karimi [2009] NSWCA 2
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 February 2009
    ...The duty does not arise merely from the fact of intoxication. (Wagstaff v Haslam [2007] NSWCA 28). Confirming Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62 and Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales Dederer [2007] HCA 42, the Court held that an inquiry into breach must be made by asking......
  • Occupiers' liability and foreseeable risk of harm
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 31 May 2012
    ...be undertaken in hindsight but must always be answered prospectively, prior to the incident occurring. (See Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62.) The question is not what could have been done, but rather, would it have been reasonable for the occupiers to take those measures. Instead ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Government liability in negligence.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 32 No. 1, April 2008
    • 1 April 2008
    ...or the other. Truly difficult cases arise. (49) (1998) 192 CLR 330. 397. (50) Ibid. (51) Ibid. (52) Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 422, 445 ('Vairy'). His Honour thought that the English attempts at a more general theory were equally unsatisfying at 444 (citations Instead, in En......
  • THE PROMISE OF UNIVERSALITY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...some of the key cases, see Mulligan v Coffs Harbour City Council(2005) 223 CLR 486 at 497, per Gummow J. 229 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council(2005) 223 CLR 422 at 450. See also Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee(1999) 200 CLR 1 at 20–21, 39, 62 and 101. 230 Stovin v Wise [1996] AC......
  • The site
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLr 479; Ratclif v McConnell [1999] 1 WLr 670 (Ca); Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLr 422 at 432 [25], per Mchugh J (dissenting); Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery (2007) 230 CLr 22 at [153], per hayne J; See Toh Siew K......
  • From Stepping-Stones to Throwing Stones: Officers’ Liability for Corporate Compliance Failures after Cassimatis
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 49-3, September 2021
    • 1 September 2021
    ...contraventions resulting froma transaction turning out otherwise than expected; contraventions resulting from a failed process or16. (2005) 223 CLR 422, 462 [128] (‘Vairy’).17. (1980) 146 CLR 40 (‘Shirt’).18. Ibid 47–8.19. For a useful discussion of the Shirt calculus and its diff‌iculties ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT