Veen v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1988-0329 HCA A,[1988] HCA 14
Year1988
Date1988

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1032 cases
2 firm's commentaries
13 books & journal articles
  • Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...Vasiljkovic (2006) 80 ALJR 1399, 1421 [107] (Gummow and Hayne JJ, Heydon J agreeing), 1435 [193] (Kirby J). 18 Veen v The Queen [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465, 476. 19 (2004) 219 CLR 562. 20 (2004) 219 CLR 562, 650 [265] (emphasis in original), referring to H L A Hart, Punishment and Responsibil......
  • CONDITIONING SENTENCING TO PREVENT DOUBLE PUNISHMENT OF OFFENDERS WHO COMMIT OFFENCES WHILE ON CONDITIONAL LIBERTY.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 46 No. 1, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...of Sentencing (Federation Press, 2010) 42-52; Bagaric, Edney and Alexander (n 5) ch 7. (10) Classically, see Veen v The Queen [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465, 476 (Mason CJ, Brennan, Dawson and Toohey JJ) ('Veen [No 2]'). The relevant legislative provisions are Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 16A(2); Cri......
  • Using Judges to Manage Risk: The Case of Thomas V Mowbray
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 36-2, June 2008
    • 1 June 2008
    ...the adjudgment of guilt of a person accused of a criminal offence.' 38 (1992) 176 CLR 1 ('Lim'). 39 Ibid 27. 40 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; R v Moffat (1997) 91 A Crim R 557. See also Fardon v Attorney General (Qld) (2004) 223 CLR 575, 634 (Kirby J) ('Fardon'). 41 (2004) 223......
  • Mandatory Harsh Penalties for People Smugglers in Australia: Time for Reform
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 76-6, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...Migration Amendment (Removal of Mandatory Minimum Penalties) Bill 2012.35 (1989) 167 CLR 348 at 354.36 (1979) 143 CLR 458 at 467.37 (1988) 164 CLR 465 at 472.Mandatory Harsh Penalties for People Smugglers in Australia499 important aim of sentencing.38 Thus, in the case of dangerous offender......
  • Get Started for Free