Visy Paper Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation2003-1008 HCA B,[2003] HCA 59
Year2003
Date2003

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
21 cases
  • Rural Press Ltd v Accc;Accc v Rural Press Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 December 2003
    ...Ltd v News Ltd (2000) 177 ALR 611 at 659 [209]. 85 See generally Visy Paper Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 201 ALR 414. 86 Kirby J assembled various economic arguments against exclusionary provisions in News Ltd v South Sydney District Rugby League Football ......
  • Csr Ltd v Della Maddalena
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 February 2006
    ...[46]; The Commonwealth v Yarmirr (2001) 208 CLR 1 at 111–112 [249]; Visy Paper Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 1 at 10 [24]; Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81 at 32 (2003) 214 CLR 118 at 139 [66] cited in [2004] WASCA 231 at [154]. 33 (2004) 78 ALJR 572......
  • Weiss v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 December 2005
    ...Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ, 111–112 [249] per Kirby J; Visy Paper Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 1 at 6–7 [7]–[9] per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ; Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment (2005) 79 ALJR 1850 at......
  • Accc v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 29 August 2007
    ...League Football Club Ltd (2003) 215 CLR 563 at 602–603 [120] and Visy Paper Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 1 at 19–20 124 See eg Competition Policy Reform Act 1995 (Cth); Australia, House of Representatives, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 30 June 1......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Australia
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Competition Laws Outside the United States. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 2 February 2020
    ...146. For a useful example of the operation and boundaries of the so-called “anti-overlap” provisions of the TPA, see Visy Paper v. ACCC [2003] H.C.A. 59. 147. See part B.1.f of this chapter. 148. See part B.5.a.(1) of this chapter. Australia-31 provisions” under the terms of Part IV, Divisi......
  • Is There a ‘Public Benefit’ in Improving Working Conditions for Independent Contractors? Collective Bargaining and the Trade Practices ACT 1974 (CTH)
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 37-2, June 2009
    • 1 June 2009
    ...44ZZRD. 37 See TP Act s 4D definition of 'exclusionary provision' and s 45(2)(a)(i), (b)(i). The High Court in Visy Paper Pty Ltd v ACCC (2003) 216 CLR 1, 25 (Kirby J) cautioned against the use of the label 'collective boycott' when referring to arrangements containing exclusionary provisio......